I am new to java, I have seen in the code at many places where my seniors have declared as
List myList = new ArrayList();
(option1)
Instead of
ArrayList myList = new ArrayList();
(option2)
Can you please tell me why people use Option1, is there any advantages?
If we use option2, do we miss out any advantages or features?
In object-oriented languages, like Smalltalk, polymorphic calls are known as message sends and polymorphic call resolution is called message dispatch. The different class-specific implementations of a message are called methods. Implementation inheritance allows default methods to be defined for sets of classes.
Polymorphism in OOPs is a concept that allows you to create classes with different functionalities in a single interface. Generally, it is of two types: compile-time (overloading) and run time (overriding), but polymorphism in PHP does not support overloading, or in other words, compile-time polymorphism.
Option 1 is considered programming to an interface, where option 2 is programming to an implementation. The latter is sometimes necessary, but the former provides you with the ability to easily switch implementations by ensuring that you don't depend on methods provided by a particular implementation.
Furthermore, if you create methods that need only the functionality provided by an interface then they should be declared as requiring the interface so that any object implementing the interface can be passed to them. Doing so broadens the scope for re-use of the API. For example:
// This can be called passing any List
public int countItems(List lst, Filter flt) {
// iterate list, apply filter, and count matching objects
}
// This can called passing only an ArrayList, an unnecessary limitation in this case
public int countItems(ArrayList lst, Filter flt) {
// iterate list, apply filter, and count matching objects
}
That said, for some interfaces, there are hidden implementation dependent traps (at least in Java). An example of this in List.get(int)
; if you have an ArrayList
this is efficient, but for a LinkedList
it is not. If the list is very large the difference can be dramatic, esp for a poorly conceived construct like this loop:
for(int xa=0,len=list.length; xa<len; xa++) {
Object obj=list.get(xa);
obj.doSomething();
}
which has terrible performance for large linked lists since the list must be traversed from the beginning for every get(xa)
.
The advantage of using option1, ie, List myList = new ArrayList();
is to have polymorphic behaviour with respect to methods. Say, for example, you can have a method which takes arguments of type List,
someMethod(List lst)
{
lst.doSomething();
//do somethng else.....
}
In this method lst
can be of type Linked List
, ArrayList
or CopyOnWriteArrayList
.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With