we want to use pimpl idiom for certain parts of our project. These parts of the project also happen to be parts where dynamic memory allocation is forbidden and this decision is not in our control.
So what i am asking is, is there a clean and nice way of implementing pimpl idiom without dynamic memory allocation?
Edit
Here are some other limitations: Embedded platform, Standard C++98, no external libraries, no templates.
The bridge pattern can also be thought of as two layers of abstraction. When there is only one fixed implementation, this pattern is known as the Pimpl idiom in the C++ world.
Stack is used for static memory allocation and Heap for dynamic memory allocation, both stored in the computer's RAM . Variables allocated on the stack are stored directly to the memory and access to this memory is very fast, and it's allocation is dealt with when the program is compiled.
Warning: the code here only showcases the storage aspect, it is a skeleton, no dynamic aspect (construction, copy, move, destruction) has been taken into account.
I would suggest an approach using the C++0x new class aligned_storage
, which is precisely meant for having raw storage.
// header class Foo { public: private: struct Impl; Impl& impl() { return reinterpret_cast<Impl&>(_storage); } Impl const& impl() const { return reinterpret_cast<Impl const&>(_storage); } static const size_t StorageSize = XXX; static const size_t StorageAlign = YYY; std::aligned_storage<StorageSize, StorageAlign>::type _storage; };
In the source, you then implement a check:
struct Foo::Impl { ... }; Foo::Foo() { // 10% tolerance margin static_assert(sizeof(Impl) <= StorageSize && StorageSize <= sizeof(Impl) * 1.1, "Foo::StorageSize need be changed"); static_assert(StorageAlign == alignof(Impl), "Foo::StorageAlign need be changed"); /// anything }
This way, while you'll have to change the alignment immediately (if necessary) the size will only change if the object changes too much.
And obviously, since the check is at compilation time, you just cannot miss it :)
If you do not have access to C++0x features, there are equivalents in the TR1 namespace for aligned_storage
and alignof
and there are macros implementations of static_assert
.
pimpl bases on pointers and you can set them to any place where your objects are allocated. This can also be a static table of objects declared in the cpp file. The main point of pimpl is to keep the interfaces stable and hide the implementation (and its used types).
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With