Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

PHP - defining classes inside a function

Is this a bad practice?

like:

function boo(){
  require_once("class.moo.php");
}
...

?

like image 259
Alex Avatar asked Feb 03 '11 19:02

Alex


3 Answers

Yes it is bad practice; no it's not.

You're likely going to get both answers, and here's why:

If you use __autoload (or equivalent), calling:

function someFunc()
{
  $n = new UndefinedClassName();
}

is equivalent to:

function someFunc()
{
  include('path/to/UndefinedClassName.php');
  //may be require_once, include_once, include, or require
  //depending on how autoload is written
  $n = new UndefinedClassName();
}

But you'll get better performance out of your code if you avoid using __autoload. And to maintain your code, it's better to put all your includes at the top of the script like you would for import statements in other languages.

include('path/to/UndefinedClassName.php');
...code...
function someFunc()
{
  $n = new UndefinedClassName();
}

I would suggest consistency. If you consistently call the include in the functions, you shouldn't have too many issues, but I would choose imports at the beginnings of files, or as autoloads.

like image 151
zzzzBov Avatar answered Oct 05 '22 08:10

zzzzBov


I would avoid it.

It is not what another developer would expect, and, as such, would reduce the maintainability of your code.

like image 27
Reed Copsey Avatar answered Oct 05 '22 10:10

Reed Copsey


This is how class loaders work. This is not necessarily bad practice.

Depends on what the function does and why you are doing this. Using autoloading may be more appropriate.

like image 24
Arnaud Le Blanc Avatar answered Oct 05 '22 10:10

Arnaud Le Blanc