One problem with using Guava's Optional
type as arguments of methods is that you can't simply write
// method declaration
public void foo(Optional<String> arg);
// compiler error
foo(Optional.absent());
due to type inference failing but instead have to add the type explicitly:
// real method call
foo(Optional.<String> absent());
How can I avoid it?
NoSuchElementException Exception Via orElseThrow() Since Java 10. Using the Optional. orElseThrow() method represents another elegant alternative to the isPresent()-get() pair. Sometimes, when an Optional value is not present, all you want to do is to throw a java.
There are no optional parameters in Java. What you can do is overloading the functions and then passing default values.
Optional class in Java is used to get an empty instance of this Optional class. This instance do not contain any value. Parameters: This method accepts nothing. Return value: This method returns an empty instance of this Optional class.
You should almost never use it as a field of something or a method parameter. So the answer is specific to Optional: it isn't "a general purpose Maybe type"; as such, it is limited, and it may be limited in ways that limit its usefulness as a field type or a parameter type.
If you are dealing with a small set of Optional<>
types (e.g., mostly strings or a handful of other types), just create some helper methods that bind the type argument for you:
public final class AbsentValues {
public static Optional<String> absentString() {
return Optional.<String>absent();
}
}
You can even import these statically to result in cleaner code:
import static AbsentValues.*;
...
foo(absentString());
For less common Optional<>
types, just specify the type argument explicitly. It may not be pretty, but it's correct.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With