Parallel.ForAsync in C# .NET?

Question

I want to execute a for loop in C# in parallel asynchronously. But the Parallel class contains only a synchronous For method and an asynchronous ForEachAsync method (.NET 6). This looks like an oversight to me.

Where is the Parallel.ForAsync method? Is there any workaround?

Answer 1

I agree,
not having a Parallel.ForAsync method looks like an enormous oversight. I have good news for you though: in .NET 8 and C#12 (coming out soon at 23. november 2023) this will be resolved.

Answer 2

The Parallel.ForAsync API was introduced in .NET 8. It has the three following overloads:

public static Task ForAsync<T>(T fromInclusive, T toExclusive,
    Func<T, CancellationToken, ValueTask> body)
    where T : notnull, IBinaryInteger<T>;

public static Task ForAsync<T>(T fromInclusive, T toExclusive,
    CancellationToken cancellationToken, Func<T, CancellationToken, ValueTask> body)
    where T : notnull, IBinaryInteger<T>;

public static Task ForAsync<T>(T fromInclusive, T toExclusive,
    ParallelOptions parallelOptions, Func<T, CancellationToken, ValueTask> body)
    where T : notnull, IBinaryInteger<T>;

It is the first public .NET API to be based on the generic math interfaces introduced in .NET 7.

Usage example:

ParallelOptions options = new() { MaxDegreeOfParallelism = 2 };

await Parallel.ForAsync(0, 100, options, async (i, ct) =>
{
   // Process the i element (here the type of i is int)
});

More information and benchmarks about this API can be found in this Microsoft document. Also here is the API proposal.