If we have a Pandas data frame consisting of a column of categories and a column of values, we can remove the mean in each category by doing the following:
df["DemeanedValues"] = df.groupby("Category")["Values"].transform(lambda g: g - numpy.mean(g))
As far as I understand, Spark dataframes do not directly offer this group-by/transform operation (I am using PySpark on Spark 1.5.0). So, what is the best way to implement this computation?
I have tried using a group-by/join as follows:
df2 = df.groupBy("Category").mean("Values")
df3 = df2.join(df)
But it is very slow since, as I understand, each category requires a full scan of the DataFrame.
I think (but have not verified) that I can speed this up a great deal if I collect the result of the group-by/mean into a dictionary, and then use that dictionary in a UDF as follows:
nameToMean = {...}
f = lambda category, value: value - nameToMean[category]
categoryDemeaned = pyspark.sql.functions.udf(f, pyspark.sql.types.DoubleType())
df = df.withColumn("DemeanedValue", categoryDemeaned(df.Category, df.Value))
Is there an idiomatic way to express this type of operation without sacrificing performance?
I understand, each category requires a full scan of the DataFrame.
No it doesn't. DataFrame aggregations are performed using a logic similar to aggregateByKey
. See DataFrame groupBy behaviour/optimization A slower part is join
which requires sorting / shuffling. But it still doesn't require scan per group.
If this is an exact code you use it is slow because you don't provide a join expression. Because of that it simply performs a Cartesian product. So it is not only inefficient but also incorrect. You want something like this:
from pyspark.sql.functions import col
means = df.groupBy("Category").mean("Values").alias("means")
df.alias("df").join(means, col("df.Category") == col("means.Category"))
I think (but have not verified) that I can speed this up a great deal if I collect the result of the group-by/mean into a dictionary, and then use that dictionary in a UDF
It is possible although performance will vary on case by case basis. A problem with using Python UDFs is that it has to move data to and from Python. Still, it is definitely worth trying. You should consider using a broadcast variable for nameToMean
though.
Is there an idiomatic way to express this type of operation without sacrificing performance?
In PySpark 1.6 you can use broadcast
function:
df.alias("df").join(
broadcast(means), col("df.Category") == col("means.Category"))
but it is not available in <= 1.5.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With