Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Opencv - Haar cascade - Face tracking is very slow

I have developed a project to tracking face through camera using OpenCV library. I used haar cascade with haarcascade_frontalface_alt.xml to detect face.

My problem is if image capture from webcame doesn't contain any faces, process to detect faces is very slow so images from camera, which are showed continuosly to user, are delayed.

My source code:

void camera() 
{
    String face_cascade_name = "haarcascade_frontalface_alt.xml";
    String eye_cascade_name = "haarcascade_eye_tree_eyeglasses.xml";
    CascadeClassifier face_cascade;
    CascadeClassifier eyes_cascade;
    String window_name = "Capture - Face detection";
    VideoCapture cap(0);

    if (!face_cascade.load(face_cascade_name))
        printf("--(!)Error loading\n");

    if (!eyes_cascade.load(eye_cascade_name))
        printf("--(!)Error loading\n");

    if (!cap.isOpened()) 
    {
        cerr << "Capture Device ID " << 0 << "cannot be opened." << endl;
    } 
    else 
    {
        Mat frame;
        vector<Rect> faces;
        vector<Rect> eyes;
        Mat original;
        Mat frame_gray;
        Mat face;
        Mat processedFace;

        for (;;) 
        {
            cap.read(frame);
            original = frame.clone();    
            cvtColor(original, frame_gray, CV_BGR2GRAY);
            equalizeHist(frame_gray, frame_gray);
            face_cascade.detectMultiScale(frame_gray, faces, 2, 0,
                    0 | CASCADE_SCALE_IMAGE, Size(200, 200));

            if (faces.size() > 0)
                rectangle(original, faces[0], Scalar(0, 0, 255), 2, 8, 0);

            namedWindow(window_name, CV_WINDOW_AUTOSIZE);
            imshow(window_name, original);
        }

        if (waitKey(30) == 27)
            break;
    }
}
like image 721
Nick Viatick Avatar asked Nov 11 '14 16:11

Nick Viatick


People also ask

Is Haar Cascade fast?

Some Haar cascade benefits are that they're very fast at computing Haar-like features due to the use of integral images (also called summed area tables). They are also very efficient for feature selection through the use of the AdaBoost algorithm.

What is better than Haar Cascade?

An LBP cascade can be trained to perform similarly (or better) than the Haar cascade, but out of the box, the Haar cascade is about 3x slower, and depending on your data, about 1-2% better at accurately detecting the location of a face.

Is hog better than Haar Cascade?

Note that HOG has higher accuracy for face detection than Haar cascade classifier. Haar cascade classifier do more False Positive prediction on faces than HOG based face detector.

How accurate are Haar Cascades?

By using Equation (3) Accuracy is obtained for the Haar cascade is 96.24% and for LBP classifier 94.74%.


2 Answers

I use Haar cascade classifiers regularly, and easily get 15 frames/second for face detection on 640x480 images, on an Intel PC/Mac (Windows/Ubuntu/OS X) with 4GB Ram and 2GHz CPU. What is your configuration?

Here are a few things that you can try.

  1. You don't have to create the window (namedWindow(window_name, CV_WINDOW_AUTOSIZE);) within each frame. Just create it first and update the image.

  2. You can try how fast it runs without histogram equalization. Not always required with a webcam.

  3. As suggested by Micka above, you should check whether your program runs in Debug mode or release mode.

  4. Use a profiler to see whether the bottleneck is.

  5. In case you haven't done it yet, have you measured the frame rate you get if you comment out face detection and drawing rectangles?

like image 137
Totoro Avatar answered Oct 22 '22 16:10

Totoro


Haar classifier is relatively slow by nature. Furthermore, there is not much of optimization you can do to the algorithm itself because detectMultiScale is parallelized in OpenCV.

The only note about your code: do you really get some faces ever detected with minSize which equals to Size(200, 200)? Though surely, the bigger the minSize - the better the performance is.

Try scaling the image before detecting anything:

const int scale = 3;
cv::Mat resized_frame_gray( cvRound( frame_gray.rows / scale ), cvRound( frame_gray.cols / scale ), CV_8UC1 );
cv::resize( frame_gray, resized_frame_gray, resized_frame_gray.size() );
face_cascade.detectMultiScale(resized_frame_gray, faces, 1.1, 3, 0 | CASCADE_SCALE_IMAGE, Size(20, 20));

(don't forget to change minSize to more reasonable value and to convert detected face locations to real scale)

Image size reducing for 2, 3, 5 times is a great performance relief for any image processing algorithm, especially when it comes to some costly stuff like detection.

As it was mentioned before, if resizing won't do the trick, try fetching some other bottlenecks using a profiler.

And you can also switch to LBP classifier which is comparably faster though less accurate.

Hope it will help.

like image 38
kazarey Avatar answered Oct 22 '22 17:10

kazarey