I have issue using OpenCV 3 tracking module for tracking. It behaves same, either I use interface class (cv::Tracker) or class with implementation (like cv::TrackerMedianFlow or cv::TrackerMIL, etc). Sample is a bit modified sample from OpenCV sample folder After correct creation
Ptr<Tracker> tracker = Tracker::create( tracker_algorithm );
if ( tracker == NULL )
{
std::cout << "***Error in the instantiation of the tracker...***\n";
return -1;
}
initialization works just fine
if ( !tracker->init( frame, boundingBox ) )
{
std::cout << "***Could not initialize tracker...***\n";
return -1;
}
Problem occurs late on, withing main loop, when tracking is lost. I use separate detector for defining new target. When I find new target, I clear tracker and initialize it with new value
tracker->clear( );
if ( !tracker->init( frame, detectedNewBBox) )
{
std::cout << "***Could not initialize tracker without history...***\n";
return -1;
}
However, initialization always returns false. I am trying to find out WHY tracker cannot be initialized? Data was check few time, and looks pretty correct. I even conducted small experiment, trying to initialize tracker right after creation with same data it won't initialize withing loop and it works perfect. Am I doing something wrong? I was unable to find any documentation on this... Here is link to available documentation on this: OpenCV 3 Tracker documentation
Thanks for any effort!
I just ran into the same problem, here's how I got it to work :
tracker->clear();
Ptr<Tracker> trackerNew = Tracker::create( tracker_algorithm );
tracker = trackerNew;
tracker->init( image, boundingBox );
Might not be the right way or the prettiest but it does the job :)
If you want to track a new ROI (region of interest) then I suggest that you should create a new tracker instead of clearing and trying to reuse a previous tracker. Re-use when you need to call init will provide no extra benefit. As you have observed, re-initializing a tracker is not allowed by default.
But if you want to resume tracking of the same object with your correction, it might be possible by doing following steps (I have not tried it myself yet. following code is just a pseudo code)
Ptr<TrackerModel> model = tracker->getModel();
Ptr<TrackerTargetState> lastTargetstate = getLastTargetState();
// Make changes to lastTargetState (update position etc)
// Set lastTargetState, I am not sure if you need to actually set it
// or just editing the object through pointer should work.
model->setLastTargetState(lastTargetstate);
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With