I have a superclass and a subclass, both of which define instance variables.
Rough outline of superclass:
/* GenericClass.h */
@interface GenericClass : NSObject {
/* some variables */
}
@end
/* GenericClass.m */
@implementation GenericClass
/* ... */
@end
Outline of subclass:
/* SpecificClass.h */
#import "GenericClass.h"
@interface SpecificClass : GenericClass {
NSMutableString *str;
}
/* SpecificClass.m */
#import "SpecificClass.h"
@implementation SpecificClass
- (void)aMethod {
//Debugger reports str as out of scope
str = [[NSMutableString alloc] initWithCapacity:100];
//Works fine:
self->str = [[NSMutableString alloc] initWithCapacity:100];
//Doesn't compile as I haven't defined @property/@synthesize:
self.str = [[NSMutableString alloc] initWithCapacity:100];
}
When I am using classes that inherit directly from NSObject, one doesn't need the self-> pointer. Note that there is no object with the name str defined in the parent GenericClass. So, my question is, why is str out of scope when not referenced as self->str? The code in itself works, but I can't read the variable with the debugger
GDB is not an Objective-C compiler. The compiler knows about things like lexical scope within Objective-C methods, but GDB does not. It does, however, understand local variables.
In Objective-C, every method has an implicit self
parameter passed to it when it's called. So when you look at self->str
, GDB is interpreting that like it would interpret any other local variable evaluation.
When you try to evaluate str
on its own, GDB will look for a local variable called str
and, not finding one, reports that it's not in scope. This is not an error; this is the expected behavior.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With