What is the difference between these two class declarations? I don't understand why @class is utilized here. Thanks.
@class TestClass; @interface TestClass: UIView { UIImage *image1; UIImage *image2; }
and
@interface TestClass: UIView { UIImage *image1; UIImage *image2; }
@class
exists to break circular dependencies. Say you have classes A and B.
@interface A:NSObject - (B*)calculateMyBNess; @end @interface B:NSObject - (A*)calculateMyANess; @end
Chicken; meet Egg. This can never compile because A's interface depends on B being defined and vice-versa.
Thus, it can be fixed by using @class
:
@class B; @interface A:NSObject - (B*)calculateMyBNess; @end @interface B:NSObject - (A*)calculateMyANess; @end
@class
effectively tells the compiler that such a class exists somewhere and, thus, pointers declared to point to instances of said class are perfectly valid. However, you couldn't call a method on an instance reference whose type is only defined as an @class
because there is no additional metadata available to the compiler (I can't remember if it reverts the call site to being evaluated as a call through id
or not).
In your example, the @class
is harmless, but entirely unnecessary.
@class TestClass;
This merely declares "class TestClass will be defined".
In this case (the one you pasted) this has no effect of whatsoever, so these are the same.
However, in case you're going to define a protocol that would use your class name (as type of parameters passed to delegate, for example), you will need to declare @class TestClass
before the protocol definition, as your class is still not defined.
In general, if you need to mention your class name before the class definition is made, you will need to issue @class
declaration first
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With