How do you handle object equality for java objects managed by hibernate? In the 'hibernate in action' book they say that one should favor business keys over surrogate keys.
Most of the time, i do not have a business key. Think of addresses mapped to a person. The addresses are keeped in a Set and displayed in a Wicket RefreshingView (with a ReuseIfEquals strategy).
I could either use the surrogate id or use all fields in the equals() and hashCode() functions.
The problem is that those fields change during the lifetime ob the object. Either because the user entered some data or the id changes due to JPA merge() being called inside the OSIV (Open Session in View) filter.
My understanding of the equals() and hashCode() contract is that those should not change during the lifetime of an object.
What i have tried so far:
What i would need is an ID that gets assigned during object creation I think. What would be my options here? I don't want to introduce some additional persistent property. Is there a way to explicitly tell JPA to assign an ID to an object?
Regards
Using the id
of an entity is not a good idea because transient entities don't have an id yet (and you still want a transient entity to be potentially equal to a persistent one).
Using all properties (apart from the database identifier) is also not a good idea because all properties are just not part of the identity.
So, the preferred (and correct) way to implement equality is to use a business key, as explained in Java Persistence with Hibernate:
Implementing equality with a business key
To get to the solution that we recommend, you need to understand the notion of a business key. A business key is a property, or some combination of properties, that is unique for each instance with the same database identity. Essentially, it’s the natural key that you would use if you weren’t using a surrogate primary key instead. Unlike a natural primary key, it isn’t an absolute requirement that the business key never changes—as long as it changes rarely, that’s enough.
We argue that essentially every entity class should have some business key, even if it includes all properties of the class (this would be appropriate for some immutable classes). The business key is what the user thinks of as uniquely identifying a particular record, whereas the surrogate key is what the application and database use.
Business key equality means that the equals() method compares only the properties that form the business key. This is a perfect solution that avoids all the problems described earlier. The only downside is that it requires extra thought to identify the correct business key in the first place. This effort is required anyway; it’s important to identify any unique keys if your database must ensure data integrity via constraint checking.
For the User class,
username
is a great candidate business key. It’s never null, it’s unique with a database constraint, and it changes rarely, if ever:public class User { ... public boolean equals(Object other) { if (this==other) return true; if ( !(other instanceof User) ) return false; final User that = (User) other; return this.username.equals( that.getUsername() ); } public int hashCode() { return username.hashCode(); } }
Maybe I missed something but for an Address, the business key would typically be made of the street number, the street, the city, the postal code, the country. I don't see any problem with that.
Just in case, Equals And HashCode is another interesting reading.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With