Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

nls - Convergence failure: singular convergence (7)

Tags:

r

statistics

nls

The following nls code throws the following error Convergence failure: singular convergence (7) for fm2(for Data2). But the same code for similar dataset works fine (fm1 for Data1).

Works Fine for this Data Set

Data1 <-
structure(list(D = c(0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 5L, 5L, 5L, 5L,
10L, 10L, 10L, 10L, 15L, 15L, 15L, 15L, 20L, 20L, 20L, 20L),
    Y = c(11.6, 9.3, 10.7, 9.2, 7.8, 8, 8.6, 7.9, 7.7,
    7.6, 7.5, 7.5, 7.2, 7.3, 7, 6.5, 6.3, 5.7, 5.6, 6)), .Names = c("D",
"Y"), class = "data.frame", row.names = c(NA, 20L))

fm1  <-
  nls(
      formula=Y~w*(1-(i*D/(100*(1+i*D/A))))
    , data=Data1
    , start=list(w=13, i=3, A=80)
    , algorithm="port"
    )

Does not Work for this Data Set

Data2 <-
structure(list(D = c(0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 5L, 5L, 5L, 5L,
10L, 10L, 10L, 10L, 15L, 15L, 15L, 15L, 20L, 20L, 20L, 20L),
    Y = c(10.8, 10.7, 8.4, 8.5, 8, 8, 8, 7.9, 7.9, 7.2,
    7.8, 7.2, 6.6, 6.5, 6.5, 6.4, 2.2, 4.5, 4.2, 6.2)), .Names = c("D",
"Y"), class = "data.frame", row.names = 21:40)

fm2  <-
  nls(
      formula=Y~w*(1-(i*D/(100*(1+i*D/A))))
    , data=Data2
    , start=list(w=13, i=3, A=80)
    , algorithm="port"
    )
like image 897
MYaseen208 Avatar asked Mar 06 '14 15:03

MYaseen208


1 Answers

I think its having problems with your parameterization. We can take advantage of linearlity by letting B be i/A, .lin1 = w and .lin2 = i*w in which case .lin1 and .lin2 enter linearly and using alg=plinear only the non-linear parameter needs a starting value:

> fo <- Y ~ cbind(1, -D/(100*(1+B*D)))
> nls(fo, Data, start = list(B = 3/80), alg = "plinear")
Nonlinear regression model
  model: Y ~ cbind(1, -D/(100 * (1 + B * D)))
   data: Data
       B    .lin1    .lin2 
-0.02217  9.26808 13.61471 
 residual sum-of-squares: 15.76

Number of iterations to convergence: 9 
Achieved convergence tolerance: 4.236e-06

From the result w = .lin1; i*w = .lin2 (so i = .lin2 / .lin1) and B = i/A (so A = i/B).

REVISED Improved the formulation.

like image 182
G. Grothendieck Avatar answered Nov 03 '22 01:11

G. Grothendieck