I have 2 webapps, 1 of them on cloud is "master", to which I need to match dates in the 2nd webapp "child".
Master (1st webapp, cloud) is showing date in IST, Asia/Kolkata which it reads from sql machine sitting in EST timezone.
Child (2nd webapp) reads it's data from Elasticsearch where a java feeder picks up the sql data and pushes it to Elasticsearch as it is, without any conversion.
When I try to read this Elasticsearch data in my webapp (child)
...
{
"_index": "log_event_2016-05-05",
"_type": "log_event",
"_id": "65708004",
"_score": null,
"_source": {
"task_name": "kn_cvs_test",
"task_start_time": "2016-05-05T19:05:05.000-07:00",
"task_end_time": "2016-05-05T19:05:06.000-07:00",
"started_by": "Schedule \"10Minutes\"",
"log_datetime": 1462475106000,
"dw_insert_dt": "2016-05-05T16:40:54.000-07:00"
},
"sort": [
1462475106000
]
}, {
"_index": "log_event_2016-05-05",
"_type": "log_event",
"_id": "65708005",
"_score": null,
"_source": {
"task_name": "kn_cvs_test",
"task_start_time": "2016-05-05T18:55:08.000-07:00",
"task_end_time": "2016-05-05T18:55:11.000-07:00",
"started_by": "Schedule \"10Minutes\"",
"log_datetime": 1462474511000,
"dw_insert_dt": "2016-05-05T16:40:54.000-07:00"
},
"sort": [
1462474511000
]
}
...
the dates in my webapp and the cloud does not match. Please correct me if I am wrong. Since Sql is storing dates in EST, "America/New_York", Momentjs should 1st read the data = 1462475106000
in EST and then apply the user timezone which is IST, "Asia/Kolkata". Is this correct?
//Timestamp column in table
//data = 1462475106000
$scope.getMeData = function(data) {
var dFormat = "YYYY-MM-DD hh:mm:ss A";
moment.tz.setDefault("America/New_York");
return moment.tz(data, "Asia/Kolkata").format(dFormat);
}
Note: 1462475106000 is the 1st entry in both table
I am putting up a plunker here. Please help me figure out what could be going wrong and how can I match dates in both the webapps (taking cloud as reference).
Update
Java feeder runs a sql query to fetch all the needed columns. Here is how log_datetime
is fetched. Is this the correct way to fetch?
(task_end_time - to_date('1-1-1970 00:00:00','MM-DD-YYYY HH24:Mi:SS'))*24*3600*1000 AS "log_datetime"
So I am assuming when it fetches data Daylight saving information is not considered and I am missing out this info too. So on UI side i'll check for isDST() and do a +5:00 hrs or +4:00 hrs depending on it, as date in sql is stored in America/New_York
. Plunker with UI fix
Convert from epoch to human-readable datemyString := DateTimeToStr(UnixToDateTime(Epoch)); Where Epoch is a signed integer. Replace 1526357743 with epoch. =(A1 / 86400) + 25569 Format the result cell for date/time, the result will be in GMT time (A1 is the cell with the epoch number).
Getting back to the question, Epoch time doesn't technically have a timezone. It is based on a particular point in time, which just so happens to line up to an "even" UTC time (at the exact beginning of a year and a decade, etc.).
To convert epoch dateTime to human readable , using a simple new date(1495159447834) will suffice.
There's only one Epoch time anywhere at a time. It's an absolute value.
A value that approximates the number of seconds that have elapsed since the Epoch. A Coordinated Universal Time name (specified in terms of seconds (tm_sec), minutes (tm_min), hours (tm_hour), days since January 1 of the year (tm_yday), and calendar year minus 1900 (tm_year)) is related to a time represented as seconds since the Epoch, according to the expression below.
Ref http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/basedefs/V1_chap04.html#tag_04_15
Epoch time is measured from the 01-01-1970 00:00:00 UTC
. That's an absolute instant in time, it's not relative to timezone as the timezone UTC
is in definition of the epoch.
Whenever you see a number for a date such as your example 1462475106000
, it should be assumed to be in UTC/GMT
. It's not a timezone specific value. Since the time is Unix based number, by epoch definition it is time passed since epoch (in UTC), making it absolute time.
(01-01-1970 00:00:00 UTC)(epoch) + 1462475106000 = Time in UTC
A date in string is a different matter entirely. It should include the timezone offset with the date part. Date part would be considered to be timezone specific value. Adding timezone offset to it would convert it to absolute value in UTC. Without timezone information a string date has no absolute value (Point in time).
2016-05-05T18:55:08.000-07:00 = (2016-05-05T18:55:08.000) + (07:00 hrs) UTC
or
date + timezone offset = date - offset hrs UTC
Databases don't store dates in any timzzone. They store absolute Unix time value. Timezone setting in databases are set so that the output of the query in string is shown in that timezone format. This setting only specifies the output date format not the value. Since the value is absolute it's same timezone independent.
This setting also helps database in determining the timezone of the date value that a user inserts if he misses the timezone offset. If the user tries to insert a string in date column without timezone database would try to default the string to database timezone setting.
So 1462475106000
is a value in UTC
as it's Unix time. It's not in EST
.
If you need date to be in EST
then use the date in string format not in number format as number format is always UTC
.
moment.tz.setDefault("America/New_York");//sets the output date format in EST
Above code will have no effect as it's overwritten by moment.tz(data, "Asia/Kolkata")
Now considering the first entry in the first screenshot.
2016-05-06T04:35:06.000+5:30 (IST) = 2016-05-05T11:05:06.000-00:00 (UTC)
Comparing it with the second screenshot, since the time difference between the two is 4 hours, second one should be in +01:30
timezone, if they both are the same values in absolute time.
2016-05-06T12:35:06.000+1:30 = 2016-05-05T11:05:06.000-00:00 (UTC)
However in the child the value is
2016-05-05T19:05:06.000-07:00 = 2016-05-06T02:05:06.000-00:00 (UTC)
Which is not the same value as both above. Interesting fact is that only date part in the child 2016-05-05T19:05:06.000
when added IST
offset +05:30
would become the date part in second screenshot.
2016-05-06T12:35:06.00 - 2016-05-05T19:05:06.000 = 5:30 (IST offset)
Leaving that aside your Java feeder code to ElasticSearch
is probably culprit here.
It's not writing the correct date-timezone combination to ElasticSearch. Try using the overloaded method getDate()
getDate(int columnIndex, Calendar cal)
in JDBC.
Sometimes JDBC driver misses timezone information, causing the date to be stored in default database timezone, using Calendar
would cure that.
Same goes for writing dates as well.
void setDate(int parameterIndex, Date x, Calendar cal) throws SQLException
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With