I started off my project by using Entity Framework Code First. When I was ready I uploaded my database and code to my host provider. Everything worked.
I need to add a new field to one of my classes and I don't want to loose the data in the database. Thus, I tried following some blog posts about using Code First Migrations. I did the following:
When I visit the site I get the following error message: The model backing the 'blahblah' context has changed since the database was created. Consider using Code First Migrations to update the database.
What am I doing wrong?
It doesn't apply to you (yet) but something to keep in mind. MVC3 and Code First Migrations - "model backing the 'blah' context has changed since the database was created" See Using Entity Framework (code first) migrations in production so that your application automatically updates the database when the Entity Framework initializes.
How to fix The model backing the context has changed since the database was created error The Problem You are coding away, and you get the following error The model backing the ‘ctx’ context has changed since the database was created. Consider using Code First Migrations to update the database
Consider using Code First Migrations to update the database model backing the context has changed since the database was created. Consider using Code First M... I am using MVC5 and EF6 CodeFirst migrations.
When using Code First with Migrations, your database creates a table called __MigrationHistory to track the current schema. When you run your application your Entity Framework will check this table to make sure that the database schema matches your database entities. If they do not match, you will get this error.
From my experience that suggests that migration table is out of sync (even if your data isn't), and that's been part of the db schema now (since 4.3 I think - under system tables).
There could be many reasons and ways to experience that error , but most of the time...
The problematic part is some combination of manually backing/restoring the full database with code changes alongside - I'm not entirely certain as to why always.
In short, even if Db-s are the same migration table data might not be - and hash comparison may fail (still full restore sounds like good enough - but you have 'two sides').
What works for me is to useUpdate-Database -Script
That creates a script with a 'migration difference',
which you can manually apply as an SQL script on the target server database (and you should get the right migration table rows inserted etc.).
If that still doesn't work - you can still do two things...
Remove the migration table (target - under system tables) - as per http://blogs.msdn.com/b/adonet/archive/2012/02/09/ef-4-3-automatic-migrations-walkthrough.aspx comments in there - that should fail back to previous behavior and if you're certain that your Db-s are the same - it's just going to 'trust you',
As a last resort I used - make a Update-Database -Script
of the full schema (e.g. by initializing an empty db which should force a 'full script'),
find the INSERT INTO [__MigrationHistory]
records,
just run those, insert them into the database,
and make sure that your databases - and code match,
that should make things run in sync again.
(disclaimer: this is not a bullet proof to work at all times, you may need to try a few things given your local scenarios - but should get you in sync)
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With