Looking a the mongodb documentation I read that FindOneAndReplace would be an ATOMIC operation. But what I don't understand is why ReplaceOne wouldn't be atomic? And if there is a difference why should one use ReplaceOne at all?
The documentation unveils a different method signature:
ReplaceOne:
ReplaceOneResult ReplaceOne(
FilterDefinition<TDocument> filter,
TDocument replacement,
ReplaceOptions options = null,
CancellationToken cancellationToken = null
)
FindOneAndReplace:
TProjection FindOneAndReplace<TProjection>(
FilterDefinition<TDocument> filter,
TDocument replacement,
FindOneAndReplaceOptions<TDocument, TProjection> options = null,
CancellationToken cancellationToken = null
)
Most notably the return type and the options parameter differ.
While ReplaceOne
returns a ReplaceOneResult, FindOneAndReplace
returns a document (be aware of the ReturnDocument property in the options).
The ReplaceOptions
are rather limited compared to FindOneAndReplaceOptions
, e.g. the former does not provide a sort
property to give you control over which document will be the first of the matching documents in the collection. This doesn't matter if you filter based on an ID, but if you want to replace the latest document the sort option is very useful.
(Side note: I personally find the documentation here https://docs.mongodb.com/manual/reference/method/db.collection.replaceOne/ and here https://docs.mongodb.com/manual/reference/method/db.collection.findOneAndReplace/ much more helpful, as they explain the usage in more detail and also provide some examples. But I don't know how closely it matches the MongoDB C# driver.)
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With