I'm creating a form in HTML using ng-repeat to generate the form elements from an object in the scope. I also use that object to generate other elements outside of the ng-repeat.
A simplified example looks like this in HTML:
<div ng-app="App">
<div ng-controller="Ctrl">
<div class="block1">
<form ng-repeat="(key, value) in test">
<label>{{key}}</label>
<input ng-model="value" />
<p>{{value}}</p>
</form>
</div>
<div class="block2">
<p>
{{test.a}}
</p>
<p>
{{test.b}}
</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
and this in JS:
angular.module('App', []);
function Ctrl($scope) {
$scope.test = {
a:"abc",
b:"def"
}
}
In this example, the text in block2 is set to the initial values of test.a
and test.b
. The input values and <p>
values inside of the loop are also set to the initial value.
When I modify the values within the inputs, the <p>
values inside of the ng-repeat block update correctly, but the <p>
tags in block2 fail to update.
Why is this the behavior? Does ng-repeat create its own isolated scope? If so how can I get the controller level scope to update? Also, could somebody explain the thinking behind this behavior and any advantages it provides?
JSFiddle Showing the problem
ng-repeat
creates a child scope for each repeated item. As a result you are trying to pass a primitive to child scope which won't create a reference to parent. When you pass objects however, you pass the original object reference.
From the mouth of one of the fathers of Angular:
Always have a dot in ng-model
This is a great video regarding Angular Best Practices given by Angular creator (2012/12/11). Go to minute 31 for well explained detail of this exact situation
Modify data to array of objects:
$scope.test = [{ val:"abc",key:'a'}, {val:"def",key:'b'} ]
Then in repeater:
<form ng-repeat="item in test">
<label>{{item.key}}</label>
<input ng-model="item.val" />
<p>{{item.val}}</p>
</form>
DEMO
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With