Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Mocking IDocumentQuery in Unit Test that uses Linq queries

I am writing unit tests for DocumentDBRepository but I got a null reference exception. I use Moq framework and XUnit.

Here's my methods in DocumentDBRepository class.

public class DocumentDBRepository<T> : IRepository<T> where T: class
{
    private static string DatabaseId;
    private static string CollectionId;
    private static IDocumentClient client;
    public DocumentDBRepository(IDocumentClient documentClient, string databaseId, string collectionId)
    {
        DatabaseId = databaseId;
        CollectionId = collectionId;
        client = documentClient;
        CreateDatabaseIfNotExistsAsync().Wait();
        CreateCollectionIfNotExistsAsync().Wait();
    }

    public async Task<IDocumentQuery<T>> GetQuery(Expression<Func<T, bool>> predicate)
    {
        try
        {
            IDocumentQuery<T> query = client.CreateDocumentQuery<T>(
          UriFactory.CreateDocumentCollectionUri(DatabaseId, CollectionId),
          new FeedOptions { MaxItemCount = -1, EnableCrossPartitionQuery = true })
          .Where(predicate)
          .AsDocumentQuery();

            return query;
        }
        catch (Exception e) {
            throw;
        }    
    }

    public async Task<IEnumerable<T>> GetEntities(IDocumentQuery<T> query)
    {
        try
        {
            List<T> results = new List<T>();
            while (query.HasMoreResults)
            {
                results.AddRange(await query.ExecuteNextAsync<T>());
            }

            return results;
        }
        catch (Exception e)
        {
            throw;
        }            
    }
}

Here's my test code:

public interface IFakeDocumentQuery<T> : IDocumentQuery<T>, IOrderedQueryable<T>
{

}

[Fact]
public async virtual Task Test_GetBooksById()
{

    var expected = new List<Book> {
        new Book { ID = "123", Description = "HarryPotter"},
        new Book { ID = "124", Description = "HarryPotter2"} };


    var response = new FeedResponse<Book>(expected);

    var mockDocumentQuery = new Mock<IFakeDocumentQuery<Book>>();

    mockDocumentQuery.SetupSequence(_ => _.HasMoreResults)
                     .Returns(true)
                     .Returns(false);

    mockDocumentQuery.Setup(_ => _.ExecuteNextAsync<Book>(It.IsAny<CancellationToken>()))
                     .ReturnsAsync(response);

    var client = new Mock<IDocumentClient>();

    client.Setup(_ => _.CreateDocumentQuery<Book>(It.IsAny<Uri>(), It.IsAny<FeedOptions>()))
          .Returns(mockDocumentQuery.Object);

    var documentsRepository = new DocumentDBRepository<Book>(client.Object, "123", "123");

    //Act
    var query = await documentsRepository.GetQuery(t => t != null);
    var entities = await documentsRepository.GetEntities(query);

    //Assert
    if (entities != null)
    {
        entities.Should().BeEquivalentTo(expected);
    }
}

Here's the error message after running the test method:

Message: System.NullReferenceException : Object reference not set to an instance of an object.

When I stepped through the code, the error happens right after the the test code called GetQuery() method:

 IDocumentQuery<T> query = client.CreateDocumentQuery<T>(
              UriFactory.CreateDocumentCollectionUri(DatabaseId, CollectionId),
              new FeedOptions { MaxItemCount = -1, EnableCrossPartitionQuery = true })
              .Where(predicate)
              .AsDocumentQuery();

Here's my thought process: when I stepped through the entire code, I do not see any null variables. But in the 'response' variable from the second line of the test method, it does show a lot of the properties are null exception but result view shows the 'expected' variable.

My question is, is it because of the response variable that caused the null reference exception? Or somewhere else?

PS: Test code reference from here

I also tried turning on the Mock behavior to strict and saw this error message.

Message: System.AggregateException : One or more errors occurred. (IDocumentClient.ReadDatabaseAsync(dbs/123, null) invocation failed with mock behavior Strict. All invocations on the mock must have a corresponding setup.) ---- Moq.MockException : IDocumentClient.ReadDatabaseAsync(dbs/123, null) invocation failed with mock behavior Strict. All invocations on the mock must have a corresponding setup.

like image 361
superninja Avatar asked Apr 18 '18 17:04

superninja


People also ask

Is mocking necessary in unit testing?

Mocking is a very popular approach for handling dependencies while unit testing, but it comes at a cost. It is important to recognize these costs, so we can choose (carefully) when the benefits outweigh that cost and when they don't.

What mocking frameworks have you used for unit testing?

Many mocking frameworks for Java code work in combination with JUnit and other popular unit testing frameworks, and are great depending on your specific needs. Two of the most widely used are Mockito and PowerMock. Mockito is useful for all but the most complicated cases, for which you can use PowerMock instead.

What is mocking in unit tests and why do we use it?

What is mocking? Mocking is a process used in unit testing when the unit being tested has external dependencies. The purpose of mocking is to isolate and focus on the code being tested and not on the behavior or state of external dependencies.


1 Answers

As suspected the problem is .Where(predicate). I ran a test with the provided example and removed the .Where clause and it executed to completion.

The fake interface inherits from both IOrderedQueryable and IDocumentQuery. The issue is that the Where is converting it back to a plain IEnumerable because of the List data source and the AsDocumentQuery is crapping out as it is expecting an IDocumentQuery

I am not a fan of tightly coupling to APIs I can't control. I would abstract my way around such implementation details for that very reason.

The work around involved having to provide a fake Linq IQueryProvider to bypass any queries and return a type that derives from IDocumentQuery so as to allow AsDocumentQuery to behave as intended.

But first I refactored GetEntities and made GetQuery private to stop the repository from being a leaky abstraction.

private IDocumentQuery<T> getQuery(Expression<Func<T, bool>> predicate) {
    var uri = UriFactory.CreateDocumentCollectionUri(DatabaseId, CollectionId);
    var feedOptions = new FeedOptions { MaxItemCount = -1, EnableCrossPartitionQuery = true };
    var queryable = client.CreateDocumentQuery<T>(uri, feedOptions);
    IQueryable<T> filter = queryable.Where(predicate);
    IDocumentQuery<T> query = filter.AsDocumentQuery();
    return query;
}

public async Task<IEnumerable<T>> GetEntities(Expression<Func<T, bool>> predicate) {
    try {
        IDocumentQuery<T> query = getQuery(predicate);
        var results = new List<T>();
        while (query.HasMoreResults) {
            results.AddRange(await query.ExecuteNextAsync<T>());
        }
        return results;
    } catch (Exception e) {
        throw;
    }
}

Note that getQuery is not doing anything async so it should not be returning a Task<> anyway.

Next in the test the mocked IDocumentQuery was set up to allow the test to flow to completion. This was done by providing a mocked IQueryProvider the would return the mocked IDocumentQuery when Linq queries are invoked against it. (which was the cause of the problem to begin with)

public async virtual Task Test_GetBooksById() {
    //Arrange
    var id = "123";
    Expression<Func<Book, bool>> predicate = t => t.ID == id;
    var dataSource = new List<Book> {
        new Book { ID = id, Description = "HarryPotter"},
        new Book { ID = "124", Description = "HarryPotter2"} 
    }.AsQueryable();

    var expected = dataSource.Where(predicate);

    var response = new FeedResponse<Book>(expected);

    var mockDocumentQuery = new Mock<IFakeDocumentQuery<Book>>();

    mockDocumentQuery
        .SetupSequence(_ => _.HasMoreResults)
        .Returns(true)
        .Returns(false);

    mockDocumentQuery
        .Setup(_ => _.ExecuteNextAsync<Book>(It.IsAny<CancellationToken>()))
        .ReturnsAsync(response);

    var provider = new Mock<IQueryProvider>();
    provider
        .Setup(_ => _.CreateQuery<Book>(It.IsAny<System.Linq.Expressions.Expression>()))
        .Returns((Expression expression) => {                
            if (expression != null) {
                dataSource = dataSource.Provider.CreateQuery<Book>(expression);
            }
            mockDocumentQuery.Object;
        });

    mockDocumentQuery.As<IQueryable<Book>>().Setup(x => x.Provider).Returns(provider.Object);
    mockDocumentQuery.As<IQueryable<Book>>().Setup(x => x.Expression).Returns(() => dataSource.Expression);
    mockDocumentQuery.As<IQueryable<Book>>().Setup(x => x.ElementType).Returns(() => dataSource.ElementType);
    mockDocumentQuery.As<IQueryable<Book>>().Setup(x => x.GetEnumerator()).Returns(() => dataSource.GetEnumerator());

    var client = new Mock<IDocumentClient>();

    client.Setup(_ => _.CreateDocumentQuery<Book>(It.IsAny<Uri>(), It.IsAny<FeedOptions>()))
          .Returns(mockDocumentQuery.Object);

    var documentsRepository = new DocumentDBRepository<Book>(client.Object, "123", "123");

    //Act
    var entities = await documentsRepository.GetEntities(predicate);

    //Assert
    entities.Should()
        .NotBeNullOrEmpty()
        .And.BeEquivalentTo(expected);
}

This allowed the test to be exercised to completion, behave as expected, and pass the test.

like image 184
Nkosi Avatar answered Oct 22 '22 19:10

Nkosi