Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Miller-Rabin Primality test FIPS 186-3 implementation

Im trying to implement the Miller-Rabin primality test according to the description in FIPS 186-3 C.3.1. No matter what I do, I cannot get it to work. The instructions are pretty specific, and I dont think I missed anything, and yet Im getting true for non-prime values.

What did I do wrong?

template <typename R, typename S, typename T>
T POW(R base, S exponent, const T mod){
    T result = 1;
    while (exponent){
        if (exponent & 1)
            result = (result * base) % mod;
        exponent >>= 1;
        base = (base * base) % mod;
    }
    return result;
}



// used uint64_t to prevent overflow, but only testing with small numbers for now
bool MillerRabin_FIPS186(uint64_t w, unsigned int iterations = 50){
    srand(time(0));
    unsigned int a = 0;
    uint64_t W = w - 1; // dont want to keep calculating w - 1
    uint64_t m = W;
    while (!(m & 1)){
        m >>= 1;
        a++;
    }

    // skipped getting wlen
    // when i had this function using my custom arbitrary precision integer class,
    // and could get len(w), getting it and using it in an actual RBG 
    // made no difference 

    for(unsigned int i = 0; i < iterations; i++){
        uint64_t b = (rand() % (W - 3)) + 2; // 2 <= b <= w - 2
        uint64_t z = POW(b, m, w);
        if ((z == 1) || (z == W))
            continue;
        else
            for(unsigned int j = 1; j < a; j++){
                z = POW(z, 2, w);
                if (z == W)
                    continue;
                if (z == 1)
                    return 0;// Composite
            }
    }
    return 1;// Probably Prime
}

this:

std::cout << MillerRabin_FIPS186(33) << std::endl;
std::cout << MillerRabin_FIPS186(35) << std::endl;
std::cout << MillerRabin_FIPS186(37) << std::endl;
std::cout << MillerRabin_FIPS186(39) << std::endl;
std::cout << MillerRabin_FIPS186(45) << std::endl;
std::cout << MillerRabin_FIPS186(49) << std::endl;

is giving me:

0
1
1
1
0
1
like image 503
calccrypto Avatar asked Jun 28 '12 00:06

calccrypto


2 Answers

The only difference between your implementation and Wikipedia's is that you forgot the second return composite statement. You should have a return 0 at the end of the loop.

Edit: As pointed out by Daniel, there is a second difference. The continue is continuing the inner loop, rather than the outer loop like it's supposed to.

for(unsigned int i = 0; i < iterations; i++){
    uint64_t b = (rand() % (W - 3)) + 2; // 2 <= b <= w - 2
    uint64_t z = POW(b, m, w);
    if ((z == 1) || (z == W))
        continue;
    else{
        int continueOuter = 0;
        for(unsigned int j = 1; j < a; j++){
            z = POW(z, 2, w);
            if (z == W)
                continueOuter = 1;
                break;
            if (z == 1)
                return 0;// Composite
        }
        if (continueOuter) {continue;}
    }
    return 0; //This is the line you're missing.
}
return 1;// Probably Prime

Also, if the input is even, it will always return probably prime since a is 0. You should add an extra check at the start for that.

like image 96
Antimony Avatar answered Oct 24 '22 09:10

Antimony


In the inner loop,

        for(unsigned int j = 1; j < a; j++){
            z = POW(z, 2, w);
            if (z == W)
                continue;
            if (z == 1)
                return 0;// Composite
        }

you should break; instead of continue; when z == W. By continueing, in the next iteration of that loop, if there is one, z will become 1 and the candidate is possibly wrongly declared composite. Here, that happens for 17, 41, 73, 89 and 97 among the primes less than 100.

like image 42
Daniel Fischer Avatar answered Oct 24 '22 08:10

Daniel Fischer