Enter git-forward-merge: Without needing to checkout destination, git-forward-merge <source> <destination> merges source into destination branch. Only works for automatic merges, if there are conflicts you need to use the regular merge.
Sometimes, you cannot merge a branch B into branch A without checking out A first if it would result in a non-fast-forward merge. This is because a working copy is needed to resolve any potential conflicts. git fetch with a refspec. This will help you to push the changes without any checkouts.
No, merging does only affect one branch.
As long as you're doing a fast-forward merge, then you can simply use
git fetch <remote> <sourceBranch>:<destinationBranch>
Examples:
# Merge local branch foo into local branch master,
# without having to checkout master first.
# Here `.` means to use the local repository as the "remote":
git fetch . foo:master
# Merge remote branch origin/foo into local branch foo,
# without having to checkout foo first:
git fetch origin foo:foo
While Amber's answer will also work in fast-forward cases, using git fetch
in this way instead is a little safer than just force-moving the branch reference, since git fetch
will automatically prevent accidental non-fast-forwards as long as you don't use +
in the refspec.
You cannot merge a branch B into branch A without checking out A first if it would result in a non-fast-forward merge. This is because a working copy is needed to resolve any potential conflicts.
However, in the case of fast-forward merges, this is possible, because such merges can never result in conflicts, by definition. To do this without checking out a branch first, you can use git fetch
with a refspec.
Here's an example of updating master
(disallowing non-fast-forward changes) if you have another branch feature
checked out:
git fetch upstream master:master
This use-case is so common, that you'll probably want to make an alias for it in your git configuration file, like this one:
[alias]
sync = !sh -c 'git checkout --quiet HEAD; git fetch upstream master:master; git checkout --quiet -'
What this alias does is the following:
git checkout HEAD
: this puts your working copy into a detached-head state. This is useful if you want to update master
while you happen to have it checked-out. I think it was necessary to do with because otherwise the branch reference for master
won't move, but I don't remember if that's really right off-the-top of my head.
git fetch upstream master:master
: this fast-forwards your local master
to the same place as upstream/master
.
git checkout -
checks out your previously checked-out branch (that's what the -
does in this case).
git fetch
for (non-)fast-forward mergesIf you want the fetch
command to fail if the update is non-fast-forward, then you simply use a refspec of the form
git fetch <remote> <remoteBranch>:<localBranch>
If you want to allow non-fast-forward updates, then you add a +
to the front of the refspec:
git fetch <remote> +<remoteBranch>:<localBranch>
Note that you can pass your local repo as the "remote" parameter using .
:
git fetch . <sourceBranch>:<destinationBranch>
From the git fetch
documentation that explains this syntax (emphasis mine):
<refspec>
The format of a
<refspec>
parameter is an optional plus+
, followed by the source ref<src>
, followed by a colon:
, followed by the destination ref<dst>
.The remote ref that matches
<src>
is fetched, and if<dst>
is not empty string, the local ref that matches it is fast-forwarded using<src>
. If the optional plus+
is used, the local ref is updated even if it does not result in a fast-forward update.
Git checkout and merge without touching working tree
Merging without changing the working directory
No, there is not. A checkout of the target branch is necessary to allow you to resolve conflicts, among other things (if Git is unable to automatically merge them).
However, if the merge is one that would be fast-forward, you don't need to check out the target branch, because you don't actually need to merge anything - all you have to do is update the branch to point to the new head ref. You can do this with git branch -f
:
git branch -f branch-b branch-a
Will update branch-b
to point to the head of branch-a
.
The -f
option stands for --force
, which means you must be careful when using it.
Don't use it unless you are absolutely sure the merge will be fast-forward.
As Amber said, fast-forward merges are the only case in which you could conceivably do this. Any other merge conceivably needs to go through the whole three-way merge, applying patches, resolving conflicts deal - and that means there need to be files around.
I happen to have a script around I use for exactly this: doing fast-forward merges without touching the work tree (unless you're merging into HEAD). It's a little long, because it's at least a bit robust - it checks to make sure that the merge would be a fast-forward, then performs it without checking out the branch, but producing the same results as if you had - you see the diff --stat
summary of changes, and the entry in the reflog is exactly like a fast forward merge, instead of the "reset" one you get if you use branch -f
. If you name it git-merge-ff
and drop it in your bin directory, you can call it as a git command: git merge-ff
.
#!/bin/bash
_usage() {
echo "Usage: git merge-ff <branch> <committish-to-merge>" 1>&2
exit 1
}
_merge_ff() {
branch="$1"
commit="$2"
branch_orig_hash="$(git show-ref -s --verify refs/heads/$branch 2> /dev/null)"
if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
echo "Error: unknown branch $branch" 1>&2
_usage
fi
commit_orig_hash="$(git rev-parse --verify $commit 2> /dev/null)"
if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
echo "Error: unknown revision $commit" 1>&2
_usage
fi
if [ "$(git symbolic-ref HEAD)" = "refs/heads/$branch" ]; then
git merge $quiet --ff-only "$commit"
else
if [ "$(git merge-base $branch_orig_hash $commit_orig_hash)" != "$branch_orig_hash" ]; then
echo "Error: merging $commit into $branch would not be a fast-forward" 1>&2
exit 1
fi
echo "Updating ${branch_orig_hash:0:7}..${commit_orig_hash:0:7}"
if git update-ref -m "merge $commit: Fast forward" "refs/heads/$branch" "$commit_orig_hash" "$branch_orig_hash"; then
if [ -z $quiet ]; then
echo "Fast forward"
git diff --stat "$branch@{1}" "$branch"
fi
else
echo "Error: fast forward using update-ref failed" 1>&2
fi
fi
}
while getopts "q" opt; do
case $opt in
q ) quiet="-q";;
* ) ;;
esac
done
shift $((OPTIND-1))
case $# in
2 ) _merge_ff "$1" "$2";;
* ) _usage
esac
P.S. If anyone sees any issues with that script, please comment! It was a write-and-forget job, but I'd be happy to improve it.
You can only do this if the merge is a fast-forward. If it's not, then git needs to have the files checked out so it can merge them!
To do it for a fast-forward only:
git fetch <branch that would be pulled for branchB>
git update-ref -m "merge <commit>: Fast forward" refs/heads/<branch> <commit>
where <commit>
is the fetched commit, the one you want to fast-forward to. This is basically like using git branch -f
to move the branch, except it also records it in the reflog as if you actually did the merge.
Please, please, please don't do this for something that's not a fast-forward, or you'll just be resetting your branch to the other commit. (To check, see if git merge-base <branch> <commit>
gives the branch's SHA1.)
In your case you can use
git fetch origin branchB:branchB
which does what you want (assuming the merge is fast-forward). If the branch can't be updated because it requires a non-fast-forward merge, then this fails safely with a message.
This form of fetch has some more useful options too:
git fetch <remote> <sourceBranch>:<destinationBranch>
Note that <remote>
can be a local repository, and <sourceBranch>
can be a tracking branch. So you can update a local branch, even if it's not checked out, without accessing the network.
Currently, my upstream server access is via a slow VPN, so I periodically connect, git fetch
to update all remotes, and then disconnect. Then if, say, the remote master has changed, I can do
git fetch . remotes/origin/master:master
to safely bring my local master up to date, even if I currently have some other branch checked out. No network access required.
Another, admittedly pretty brute way is to just re-create the branch:
git fetch remote
git branch -f localbranch remote/remotebranch
This throws away the local outdated branch and re-creates one with the same name, so use with care ...
You can clone the repo and do the merge in the new repo. On the same filesystem, this will hardlink rather than copy most of the data. Finish by pulling the results into the original repo.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With