Could someone describe why this code doesn't work (on GCC4.7.3 seg-faults before returning from call)?
#include <iostream>
#include <functional>
#include <memory>
using namespace std;
template<typename F>
auto memo(const F &x) -> std::function<decltype(x())()> {
typedef decltype(x()) return_type;
typedef std::function<return_type()> thunk_type;
std::shared_ptr<thunk_type> thunk_ptr = std::make_shared<thunk_type>();
*thunk_ptr = [thunk_ptr, &x]() {
cerr << "First " << thunk_ptr.get() << endl;
auto val = x();
*thunk_ptr = [val]() { return val; };
return (*thunk_ptr)();
};
return [thunk_ptr]() { return (*thunk_ptr)(); };
};
int foo() {
cerr << "Hi" << endl;
return 42;
}
int main() {
auto x = memo(foo);
cout << x() << endl ;
cout << x() << endl ;
cout << x() << endl ;
};
My original assumptions:
std::function<T()>
is kinda reference/shared_ptr to some object that represents closure. I.e. life-time of picked up value is limited by it.std::function<T()>
object have assignment operator that will abandon old closure (end life-time picked values) and will take ownership for a new value.P.S. This question raised after I read question about lazy in C++11
Creating a Lambda Expression in C++auto greet = []() { // lambda function body }; Here, [] is called the lambda introducer which denotes the start of the lambda expression. () is called the parameter list which is similar to the () operator of a normal function.
They allocate on the stack, not heap. Their assembly output is identical to using a class. You don't need to capture static variables. If you want to return a lambda, use std::function or similar.
A capture clause of lambda definition is used to specify which variables are captured and whether they are captured by reference or by value. An empty capture closure [ ], indicates that no variables are used by lambda which means it can only access variables that are local to it.
Lambda expressions can capture of outer scope variables into a lambda function. The captured variables are stored in the closure object created for the lambda function.
This is the problematic code:
[thunk_ptr, &x]() {
auto val = x();
*thunk_ptr = [val]() { return val; };
return (*thunk_ptr)(); // <--- references a non-existant local variable
}
The problem is that the local thunk_ptr
is a copy from the context. That is, in the assignment *thunk_ptr = ...
the thunk_ptr
refers to the copy owned by the function object. However, with the assignment the function object ceases to exist. That is, on the next line thunk_ptr
refers to a just destroyed object.
There are a few approaches to fix the problem:
val
. The problem here is that return_type
may be a reference type which would cause this approach to fail.Return the result straight from the assignment: prior to the assignment thunk_ptr
is still alive and after the assignment it still return a reference to the std::function<...>()
object:
return (*thunk_ptr = [val](){ return val; })();
Safe a copy of thunk_ptr
and use this copy to call the function object in the return
statement:
std::shared_ptr<thunk_type> tmp = thunk_ptr;
*tmp = [val]() { return val; };
return (*tmp)();
Save a copy of reference to std::function
and use it instead of referring to field that belongs to overwritten closure:
auto &thunk = *thunk_ptr;
thunk = [val]() { return val; };
return thunk();
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With