I need to implement RSA encryption/decryption using C#
I have a private key with following parameters:
mod n
, exponent
, p
, q
, dP
, dQ
, and (p
-1
mod q)
Above parameters are explained in Chinese remainder algorithm
However C#.NET implementation of the RSA has different parameter set as following:
Modulus
, Exponent
, P
, Q
, DP
, DQ
, D
, InverseQ
When I'm trying to map the data from CRT
to DOTNET
, I get error Bad Data
For p
,q
, dP
and dQ
the mapping is obvious but about the rest of parameters I'm not sure.
It would be great if I can get help mapping these paramters
In RSA-CRT, it is a common practice to employ the Chinese Remainder Theo- rem during decryption. It results in a decryption much faster than modular exponen- tiation. RSA-CRT differs from the standard RSA in key generation and decryption.
Arithmetic in CRT representation The CRT coefficient qInv = (1/q) mod p can be pre-computed. The cost of doing modular exponentiation increases by the cube of the number of bits k in the modulus, so doing two exponentiation calculations mod p and mod q is much more efficient than doing one exponentiation mod n.
To compute the value for d, use the Extended Euclidean Algorithm to calculate d=e−1modϕ, also written d=(1/e)modϕ. This is known as modular inversion .
To decrypt a ciphertext C using an RSA public key we simply compute the plaintext M as: M = Cd mod N. Note that both RSA encryption and RSA decryption involve a modular exponentiation and so we would be well advised to use the Repeated Squares Algorithm if we want to make these processes reasonably efficient.
mod n
maps to Modulus
, p
-1
mod q
maps to InverseQ
, the encryption exponent maps to Exponent
and the decryption exponent maps to D
.
The encryption exponent e
and the decryption exponent d
are related by e*d = 1 mod (p-1)(q-1). Thus if you have one them you can easily derive the other use a few methods from the System.Numerics.BigInteger class.
var Pminus1 = BigInteger.Subtract(P, BigInteger.One);
var Qminus1 = BigInteger.Subtract(Q, BigInteger.One);
var Phi = BigInteger.Multiply(Pminus1, Qminus1);
var PhiMinus1 = BigInteger.Subtract(Phi, BigInteger.One);
// var D = BigInteger.ModPow(E, PhiMinus1, Phi);
Note that care must be taken when constructing a .NET BigInteger, especially if you are used to Java's BigInteger class. See this question for more information.
EDIT :
As CodeInChaos points out that last line is WRONG!
WRONG! WRONG! WRONG!
I am embarrassed. In a bow to the forces of evil the BigInteger class does not have a modular inverse method nor an extended euclidean algorithm method. You can nevertheless google for 'c # extended euclidean algorithm' you can find many implementations. The extended euclidean algorithm will give you integers x and y such that 1 = e*x + phi * y. x is the inverse of e mod phi, so setting D = x mod phi is what is needed.
Extended Euclidean algorithm can be used to compute the modular inverse, in this case D will be calculated, use this link: http://www.di-mgt.com.au/euclidean.html#extendedeuclidean to get the detail, I tested the source code in C# as below, and the result is matching,
public static BigInteger modinv(BigInteger u, BigInteger v)
{
BigInteger inv, u1, u3, v1, v3, t1, t3, q;
BigInteger iter;
/* Step X1. Initialise */
u1 = 1;
u3 = u;
v1 = 0;
v3 = v;
/* Remember odd/even iterations */
iter = 1;
/* Step X2. Loop while v3 != 0 */
while (v3 != 0)
{
/* Step X3. Divide and "Subtract" */
q = u3 / v3;
t3 = u3 % v3;
t1 = u1 + q * v1;
/* Swap */
u1 = v1; v1 = t1; u3 = v3; v3 = t3;
iter = -iter;
}
/* Make sure u3 = gcd(u,v) == 1 */
if (u3 != 1)
return 0; /* Error: No inverse exists */
/* Ensure a positive result */
if (iter < 0)
inv = v - u1;
else
inv = u1;
return inv;
}
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With