If I have a flexbox container containing multiple containers, how do I make the containers' contained items wrap before the containers themselves?
For example (codepen):
HTML
<div>
<row>
<column id="first">
<widget width=1 height=8></widget>
<widget width=1 height=8></widget>
</column>
<row id="second">
<widget></widget>
<widget></widget>
<widget></widget>
</row>
</row>
</div>
CSS
column, row, widget {
background: RGBA(0,0,0,.2);
margin: 1em;
display: flex;
flex-wrap: wrap;
align-items: top;
align-content: flex-start;
}
row {
flex-direction: row;
}
column {
flex-direction: column;
}
widget {
min-height: 100px;
flex-grow: 2;
flex-shrink: 1;
width: calc(25% - 3em);
min-width: 300px;
height: 100px;
flex-basis: 0;
padding: .5em;
display: block;
}
widget[width=1] {
flex-grow: 1;
min-width: 150px;
}
widget[width=4] {
flex-grow: 4;
min-width: 600px;
}
widget[width=8] {
flex-grow: 8;
min-width: 1200px;
}
widget[height=1] {
min-height: 150px;
}
widget[height=4] {
min-height: 600px;
}
widget[height=8] {
min-height: 1200px;
}
widget {
background: RGBA(200,0,20,.5);
}
I want the items in #second
to wrap before #second
itself wraps below #first
. In other words, I always want to try wrapping the innermost items before trying to wrap the outermost ones, which seems to be the opposite of what happens by default. Is there any way to do this?
EDIT: There were requests for visual clarification.
2 containers with several items each:
Desired behavior, slightly smaller. Innermost items wrap before their containers.
Desired behavior, smaller still.
Desired behavior, smallest. After the innermost items can't wrap any more, the containers finally wrap.
What actually happens: the containers wrap before their contents.
You can create two dimensional layouts by nesting a flex container inside another one. Flexbox is inherently a one dimensional layout model. Flex items within a flex container can be laid out either horizontally or vertically, but not both.
Nested flex boxesIt's possible to create some pretty complex layouts with flexbox. It's perfectly OK to set a flex item to also be a flex container, so that its children are also laid out like flexible boxes.
The flex-wrap CSS property sets whether flex items are forced onto one line or can wrap onto multiple lines. If wrapping is allowed, it sets the direction that lines are stacked.
I don't believe there are any flex properties that make this process simple and easy. However, the flexbox specification does allow for absolutely-positioned flex children. So with a combination of media queries and absolute positioning, the flex items within the container can be made to wrap before the container itself wraps.
Try this:
HTML (no changes)
CSS (add media queries and absolute positioning)
#second { position: relative; }
/* establishes nearest positioned ancestor for absolute positioning */
@media screen and (max-width: 1000px) {
#second widget:nth-child(3) {
position: absolute;
left: 0;
bottom: 0;
width: 90%; }
}
@media screen and (max-width: 800px) {
#second { height: 375px; }
#second widget:nth-child(2) {
position: absolute;
left: 0;
bottom: 127px;
width: 75%; }
#second widget:nth-child(3) {
position: absolute;
left: 0;
bottom: 0;
width: 75%; }
}
/* final media query removes absolute positioning and restores flex properties */
@media screen and (max-width: 600px) {
column, row, widget { flex-wrap: wrap; }
#second widget {
position: static;
width: calc(25% - 3em);
min-width: 300px;
}
Revised Codepen
Note that although this code does what the question asks – it wraps flex items in their container before the container itself wraps – it's only meant to convey the basic concept of the solution. Issues like margin and width for flex items, which I considered beyond the scope of this question, may still need to be addressed.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With