for() or while() - which is BEST?
for (i=1; i<a; i++)
/* do something */
OR
i=1;
while (i<a) {
/* do something */
i++;
}
While loops and for loops are equally efficient. I remember my computer teacher from highschool told me that for loops are more efficient for iteration when you have to increment a number. That is not the case. For loops are simply syntactically sugared while loops, and make iteration code faster to write.
Using for: % Time elapsed: 0.0010001659 seconds. Using while: % Time elapsed: 0.026000023 seconds. The main reason that While is much slower is because the while loop checks the condition after each iteration, so if you are going to write this code, just use a for loop instead.
Further, as a for loop it is easier to read as everything (initialization, loop condition, expression to be executed after each iteration) are all on one line. For the while loop they are spread out hindering readability.
The major difference between for loop and while loop is that in the case of for loop the number of iterations is known whereas in the case of the while loop number of iterations is unknown and the statement will run until the condition is proved false.
The first is the idiomatic way; it is what most C coders will expect to see. However, I should note that most people will also expect to see
for(i = 0; i < a; i++)
Note that the loop starts at zero. This will do something a
times. If you're going to write a while
loop that is equivalent to a for
loop as above I strongly encourage you to write it as a for
loop. Again, it is what C coders expect to see. Further, as a for
loop it is easier to read as everything (initialization, loop condition, expression to be executed after each iteration) are all on one line. For the while
loop they are spread out hindering readability.
Note, however, there are circumstances in which seemingly equivalent for
and while
loops are actually not. For example:
for(i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
if(i == 5) continue;
printf("%d\n", i);
}
and
i = 0;
while(i < 10) {
if(i == 5) continue;
printf("%d\n", i);
i++;
}
appear at first glance to be equivalent but they are not. The for
loop will print 0--9
skipping 5
on the console whereas the while
loop will print 0--4
on the console and then enter an infinite loop.
Now, that handles the simple case that you asked about. What about the more complex cases that you didn't ask about? Well, it really depends but a good rule of thumb is this: if you are going to repeat something a fixed pre-determined number of times, a for
loop is generally best. Otherwise, use a while
loop. This is not a hard-and-fast rule but it is a good rule-of-thumb. For example, you could write
unsigned int v;
unsigned int c;
for(c = 0; v; v >>= 1) c += v & 1;
but I think most C programmers would write this as
unsigned int v;
unsigned int c;
c = 0;
while(v) { c += v & 1; v >>= 1; }
Or, as another example, if you're going to read until the end of a file then you should use a while
loop. Thus
FILE *fp;
fp = fopen(path, "r");
while(fgets(buf, max, fp) != NULL) { /* something */ }
instead of
FILE *fp;
for(fp = fopen(path, "r"); fgets(buf, max, fp) != NULL; ) { /* something */ }
Now, reaching into religious territory, this is why I prefer while(1)
as the right way to do an infinite loop over for(;;)
.
Hope that helps.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With