Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

localtime vs localtime_s and appropriate input arguments

Tags:

c++

localtime

time_t rawtime; struct tm * timeinfo; time ( &rawtime ); timeinfo = localtime ( &rawtime ); 

This returns: warning C4996: 'localtime': This function or variable may be unsafe. Consider using localtime_s instead.

time_t rawtime; struct tm * timeinfo; time ( &rawtime ); timeinfo = localtime_s ( &rawtime ); 

When I change localtime to localtime_s I get: error C2660: 'localtime_s' : function does not take 1 arguments

Here is what I think is going on in the first block of code:

  • create an empty time_t variable.
  • create a pointer to timeinfo which is defined in ctime
  • write the rawtime into a rawtime reference
  • convert the rawtime into something meaningful to pedestrians

    1. Am I right?
    2. What second input parameter does localtime_s need?
    3. What's the worst that could happen if I just ignore the whole localtime safety issue.
like image 615
ProGirlXOXO Avatar asked Jan 17 '13 19:01

ProGirlXOXO


1 Answers

localtime returns a pointer to a statically allocated struct tm.

With localtime_s, you pass in a pointer to a struct tm, and localtime_s writes its result data into that, so your code would change from:

struct tm *timeinfo; timeinfo = localtime(&rawtime); 

to something like:

struct tm timeinfo; localtime_s(&timeinfo, &rawtime); 

This way, it's writing to your buffer instead of having a buffer of its own.

like image 177
Jerry Coffin Avatar answered Oct 06 '22 12:10

Jerry Coffin