In such a situation
namespace n {
void f() {
void another_function();
}
}
Should the function another_function
be defined inside the namespace n
or outside? VS 2012 (with the November CTP) says it should be outside, and GCC 4.7.2 on the Mac says it should be inside. If I do the wrong one, I get undefined symbol errors from the linkers.
I generally trust GCC to be more compliant to the standard, but this is C++ and you can never be sure.
C++11 3.5 (as well as C++03)
7 When a block scope declaration of an entity with linkage is not found to refer to some other declaration, then that entity is a member of the innermost enclosing namespace. However such a declaration does not introduce the member name in its namespace scope.
The declaration in your example declares n::another_function
.
According to N3485 7.3.1 [namespace.def]/6, the correct answer is n::another_function
.
The enclosing namespaces of a declaration are those namespaces in which the declaration lexically appears, except for a redeclaration of a namespace member outside its original namespace (e.g., a definition as specified in 7.3.1.2). Such a redeclaration has the same enclosing namespaces as the original declaration. [ Example:
namespace Q { namespace V { void f(); // enclosing namespaces are the global namespace, Q, and Q::V class C { void m(); }; } void V::f() { // enclosing namespaces are the global namespace, Q, and Q::V extern void h(); // ... so this declares Q::V::h } void V::C::m() { // enclosing namespaces are the global namespace, Q, and Q::V } }
—end example ]
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With