I'm contributing to open source library and got lint error "Do not treat position as fixed; only use immediately and call holder.getAdapterPosition() to look it up later" for this code:
@Override public void onBindViewHolder(RecyclerView.ViewHolder holder, int position) {
mAdapter.onBindViewHolder(holder, position);
if (!isFirstOnly || position > mLastPosition) {
for (Animator anim : getAnimators(holder.itemView)) {
anim.setDuration(mDuration).start();
anim.setInterpolator(mInterpolator);
}
mLastPosition = position;
} else {
ViewHelper.clear(holder.itemView);
}
}
I've checked that it is because the position is saved for the future use. It is a question to library creator why they need this logic. But issue disappeared when I change the usage of the position to the usage holder.getAdapterPosition()
:
@Override public void onBindViewHolder(RecyclerView.ViewHolder holder, int position) {
mAdapter.onBindViewHolder(holder, position);
if (!isFirstOnly || holder.getAdapterPosition() > mLastPosition) {
for (Animator anim : getAnimators(holder.itemView)) {
anim.setDuration(mDuration).start();
anim.setInterpolator(mInterpolator);
}
mLastPosition = holder.getAdapterPosition();
} else {
ViewHelper.clear(holder.itemView);
}
}
I assume that conceptually it didn't change much but lint is satisfied now. Why?
The documentation of RecyclerView.Adapter.onBindViewHolder() states:
Note that unlike ListView, RecyclerView will not call this method again if the position of the item changes in the data set unless the item itself is invalidated or the new position cannot be determined. For this reason, you should only use the position parameter while acquiring the related data item inside this method and should not keep a copy of it. If you need the position of an item later on (e.g. in a click listener), use getAdapterPosition() which will have the updated adapter position
So, technically items may be re-arranged (like sorted, or moved around) and binding will not be necessary because items are not invalidated yet. This means onBindViewHolder()
may NOT be called if items show the same data, but just their position/index in a list changes. The position
variable received holds true only for the scope of bind function and will not always point to the correct position in the data set. That's why the function getAdapterPosition()
must be called every time updated position is needed.
IMHO, mLastPosition = holder.getAdapterPosition();
is still potentially wrong. Because item may be re-arranged and mLastPosition
still points to old position.
About why lint is silent, perhaps Lint's rule is not that thorough. It's only checking whether the position
parameter is being copied or not.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With