Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Linq - SelectMany Confusion

From what I understand from the documentation of SelectMany, one could use it to produce a (flattened) sequence of a 1-many relationship.

I have following classes

  public class Customer   {     public int Id { get; set; }     public string Name { get; set; }   }    class Order   {     public int Id { get; set; }     public int CustomerId { get; set; }     public string Description { get; set; }   } 

I then try to use them using the query expression syntax like so

  var customers = new Customer[]   {     new Customer() { Id=1, Name ="A"},     new Customer() { Id=2, Name ="B"},     new Customer() { Id=3, Name ="C"}   };    var orders = new Order[]   {     new Order { Id=1, CustomerId=1, Description="Order 1"},     new Order { Id=2, CustomerId=1, Description="Order 2"},     new Order { Id=3, CustomerId=1, Description="Order 3"},     new Order { Id=4, CustomerId=1, Description="Order 4"},     new Order { Id=5, CustomerId=2, Description="Order 5"},     new Order { Id=6, CustomerId=2, Description="Order 6"},     new Order { Id=7, CustomerId=3, Description="Order 7"},     new Order { Id=8, CustomerId=3, Description="Order 8"},     new Order { Id=9, CustomerId=3, Description="Order 9"}   };    var customerOrders = from c in customers                        from o in orders                        where o.CustomerId == c.Id                        select new                                {                                   CustomerId = c.Id                                  , OrderDescription = o.Description                                };    foreach (var item in customerOrders)     Console.WriteLine(item.CustomerId + ": " + item.OrderDescription); 

This gives to what I need.

1: Order 1 1: Order 2 1: Order 3 1: Order 4 2: Order 5 2: Order 6 3: Order 7 3: Order 8 3: Order 9 

I assume this translates to using the SelectMany method when not using the query expression syntax?

Either ways, I'm trying to wrap my head around using SelectMany. So even if my above query does not translate to SelectMany, given the two classes and mock data, could someone provide me with a linq query that uses SelectMany?

like image 385
Jackie Kirby Avatar asked Feb 16 '11 15:02

Jackie Kirby


People also ask

What is Linq SelectMany?

What is Linq SelectMany? The SelectMany in LINQ is used to project each element of a sequence to an IEnumerable<T> and then flatten the resulting sequences into one sequence. That means the SelectMany operator combines the records from a sequence of results and then converts it into one result.

Can SelectMany return null?

@flem They can never be null because that's how Where and SelectMany work. If the input is null they throw an exception, and if it's not null the result will either be a sequence of items, or an empty sequence.

What is the difference between select and SelectMany in Linq?

Select and SelectMany are projection operators. A select operator is used to select value from a collection and SelectMany operator is used to selecting values from a collection of collection i.e. nested collection.

What is SelectMany?

The SelectMany() method is used to "flatten" a sequence in which each of the elements of the sequence is a separate, subordinate sequence.


1 Answers

Here is your query using SelectMany, modeled exactly after your example. Same output!

        var customerOrders2 = customers.SelectMany(             c => orders.Where(o => o.CustomerId == c.Id),             (c, o) => new { CustomerId = c.Id, OrderDescription = o.Description }); 

The first argument maps each customer to a collection of orders (completely analagous to the 'where' clause you already have).

The second argument transforms each matched pair {(c1, o1), (c1, o2) .. (c3, o9)} into a new type, which I've made the same as your example.

So:

  • arg1 maps each element in the base collection to another collection.
  • arg2 (optional) transforms each pair into a new type

The resulting collection is flat like you'd expect in your original example.

If you were to omit the second argument, you would end up with a collection of all orders the match up to a customer. It'd be just that, a flat collection of Order objects.

Using it takes a lot of getting used to, I still have trouble wrapping my head around it sometimes. :(

like image 116
Sapph Avatar answered Oct 06 '22 14:10

Sapph