Is there any way one can apply a function with signature
bool IsOdd(int number);
to an array of integers and return whether any given integer in that array is odd in a single instruction? I know I can use
return (array.Where(IsOdd).Count() > 0);
but that implies calling two methods and making a comparison... Isn't there really a shorter way to achieve the same?
Language-Integrated Query (LINQ) is the name for a set of technologies based on the integration of query capabilities directly into the C# language. Traditionally, queries against data are expressed as simple strings without type checking at compile time or IntelliSense support.
The main difference between LINQ and SQL is that LINQ is a Microsoft . NET framework component, which adds native data querying capabilities to . NET languages, while SQL is a standard language to store and manage data in RDBMS.
LINQ (Language Integrated Query) is uniform query syntax in C# and VB.NET to retrieve data from different sources and formats. It is integrated in C# or VB, thereby eliminating the mismatch between programming languages and databases, as well as providing a single querying interface for different types of data sources.
The primary reason that LINQ was introduced with C# 3.0 was to reduce the amount of coding that object retrieval required, in comparison to more traditional for each loops, and it is largely due to this reason that LINQ has gained such popularity within the field.
Yes.
To start with you could use the form of Count
which takes a predicate:
return array.Count(IsOdd) > 0;
... but you don't want to do that. That code is still expressing a numerical comparison which is unnecessary. You want to ask if any item in the array is odd. In other words:
return array.Any(IsOdd);
Not only is this more expressive - it's also potentially much faster. As soon as Any
finds a match, it will return true
- whereas Count
would have to iterate over the whole array to find out exactly how many matches there are.
Basically, whenever you see a LINQ query using Count() > 0
you should think about using Any
instead. In some cases with expression-tree-based queries such as LINQ to SQL it may not make a performance difference (if the query optimizer has visibility of the comparison with 0) but in LINQ to Objects it certainly can.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With