Less try / More catch

Question

I need to know if doing less Try and doing more Catchs is a good way to control a flux what is very important in exception control terms.

Because in the flux this should never go on if there's something goes wrong!

i'm not trying to save code lines, i need something visually easy to understand and functionally in code terms

Var ix;
Var iy;
Var iz;

try {
    try {
        do something ix;
    } catch (Exception ex1) {
        ex1.printStackTrace();
    }

    try {
        do something iy;
    } catch (Exception ex2) {
        ex2.printStackTrace();
    }

    do something iz;
} catch (Exception ex3) {
    ex3.printStackTrace();
}

OR

Var ix;
Var iy;
Var iz;

try {
        do something ix;
        do something iy;
        do something iz;

} catch (Exception ex1) {
    ex1.printStackTrace();
} catch (Exception ex2) {
    ex2.printStackTrace();
} catch (Exception ex3) {
    ex3.printStackTrace();
}

Answer 1

Those two examples will actually behave differently. In the second, if an exception is caught then none of the following do something will run. In the first they can each fail independently.