LESS CSS: Reuse generated .@{name} class as a mixin

Question

I'm using LESS CSS 1.3.3. Sorry if this question has already been asked, I didn't find anything relevant on the web.

I have several class generators that look like this (example extremely simplified, just enough to trigger the error):

#genMarginTop (@name, @size) {
    .@{name} { margin-top: @size; }
}

Then I use them to generate some actual classes:

#genMarginTop(mtStandard, 40px);
#genMarginTop(mtHalf, 20px);

So far, so good, LESS correctly generates those classes and I can use them in the HTML. However when I want to reuse such a generated class as a mixin somewhere else, I get an error:

.someClass {
    .mtStandard; // won't work, see error below
    // more stuff
}

The error I get is:

NameError: .mtStandard is undefined in /.../example.less:161:4
160 .someClass {
161     .mtStandard;
162     // more stuff

Of course I try to use the mixin after the class has been generated. It looks like LESS somehow won't register such generated classes internally after it generates them, but I could well be wrong.

Is there a way to reuse such generated classes as mixins in other classes? Being quite new with LESS, and their documentation being rather sparse about generated classes, I'm at a total loss (especially since this is the only syntax that seems to be accepted for mixins).

Thanks for reading me.

---

Note: The reason why I use such class generators is because they are much more complex than the example above (think nested classes that all depend on a common set of parameters), and I'm embedding the generated classes in various @media queries to support any device type in a "Zen" fashion. In the end I get something like:

@media (max-width: 1024px) {
    #genSomething(something, somethingParam1, ...);
    #genSomething(somethingElse, somethingElseParam1, ...);
    #genStuff(stuff, stuffParam1, ...);
}
@media (max-width: 240px) {
    #genSomething(something, somethingParam2, ...);
    #genSomething(somethingElse, somethingElseParam2, ...);
    #genStuff(stuff, stuffParam2, ...);
}
// etc

---

Solution / test case

Here's a test case for @MartinTurjak 's solution, I can confirm that this works as expected, nested classes and everything:

.explicit {
  margin-top: 1;
  input { margin-top: 1; }
}
.reuseExplicit {
  .explicit;
  margin-bottom: 1;
}
#generator (@arg) {
  margin-top: @arg;
  input {
    margin-top: @arg;
  }
}
.generated { #generator(1); }
.reuseGenerated {
  .generated;
  margin-bottom: 1;
}

Which correctly generates: (notice how explicit/generated yield the very same result)

.explicit {
  margin-top: 1;
}
.explicit input {
  margin-top: 1;
}
.reuseExplicit {
  margin-top: 1;
  margin-bottom: 1;
}
.reuseExplicit input {
  margin-top: 1;
}
.generated {
  margin-top: 1;
}
.generated input {
  margin-top: 1;
}
.reuseGenerated {
  margin-top: 1;
  margin-bottom: 1;
}
.reuseGenerated input {
  margin-top: 1;
}

Answer 1

Unfortunately. The selector interpolation is just string interpolation, and the string gets then printed into css, so no class object is generated in the less run.

So you can design a generator/mixin, that includes your operation:

#genMarginTop (@size) {
  margin-top: @size;
}

But then build classes by calling the mixins / generators:

.mtStandard {#genMarginTop(40px);}
.mtHalf {#genMarginTop(20px);}

And this way they are class objects that you can use for mixin =)

.someClass {
  background-color: #FFF;
  .mtStandard;
  //more of this stuff
}

This looks a bit silly in this simple example, but maybe something like this:

 #bggenerator (@color) {
    background-color: @color;
 }
 #bggenerator (@color, dark) {
    @blend : @color + #842210;
    background-color: darken(@blend, 30%);
 }
 #bggenerator (@color, @url, @rest) {
    background: "@{color} url('@{url}') @{rest}";
 }

 .mtStandard {
    #genMarginTop(40px);
 }

.someClass {
  .mtStandard;
  #bggenerator(#FFF, "bgimage.png", left top no-repeat);
  //more of this stuff
}

Or something that does even more exciting stuff with the arguments

Answer 2

I agree. It looks like LESS does not register those classes for mixin purposes.

Incomplete Solution

This LESS code:

#genMarginTop (@name, @size) {
  @genMarginTopNameCheck: @name; 
  .get(@name) when (@name = @genMarginTopNameCheck) { margin-top: @size; }
  .@{name} { .get(@name); }
}
#genMarginBot (@name, @size) {
    @genMarginBotNameCheck: @name; 
    .get(@name) when (@name = @genMarginBotNameCheck)  { margin-bottom: @size; }
    .@{name} { .get(@name); }
}


#genMarginTop(mtStandard, 40px);
#genMarginBot(mbStandard, 20px);
#genMarginTop(mtSpecial, 80px);

.myClass {
  .get(mtStandard);
  .get(mbStandard); 
}

.myClass2 {
  .get(mtSpecial);
  .get(mbStandard); 
}

Generates this CSS

.mtStandard {
  margin-top: 40px;
}
.mbStandard {
  margin-bottom: 20px;
}
.mtSpecial {
  margin-top: 80px;
}
.myClass {
  /* NOTE the mtStandard definition is missing here !!! */
  margin-bottom: 20px;
}
.myClass2 {
  margin-top: 80px;
  margin-bottom: 20px;
}

Explanation and Disscussion of Final Issue to Resolve

Each mixin is defining a guarded .get() mixin based off the @name to get the styles, and that is cross checked to a unique NameCheck variable name for that mixin. All your actual code is defined in the .get(), and that mixin is used to actually generate the .@{name} class code.

This works fine every time for generating the actual class name. However, the getter function at present is only working for the class name last defined by a use of the mixin. So as you can see above, my get call for mtStandard is not working because my setting of mtSpecial has apparently overwritten the #genMarginTop .get() mixin with the mtSpecial definition.

Now I assume you are going to want to call #getMarginTop and your other such mixins more than once, so obviously this is still an incomplete solution. I've figured out how you can get the class generated by the top level mixin to be used as a 'mixin' for another class using the .get(), but I haven't figure out how to make the .get() not get overridden when the top level mixin is called again.