I'm trying to implement a record definition DSL using lark. It is based on indentation, which makes things a bit more complex.
Lark is a great tool, but I'm facing some dificulteis.
Here is a snippet of the DSL I'm implementing:
record Order :
"""Order record documentation
should have arbitrary size"""
field1 Int
field2 Datetime:
"""Attributes should also have
multiline documentation"""
field3 String "inline documentation also works"
and here is the grammar used:
?start: (_NEWLINE | redorddef)*
simple_type: NAME
multiline_doc: MULTILINE_STRING _NEWLINE
inline_doc: INLINE_STRING
?element_doc: ":" _NEWLINE _INDENT multiline_doc _DEDENT | inline_doc
attribute_name: NAME
attribute_simple_type: attribute_name simple_type [element_doc] _NEWLINE
attributes: attribute_simple_type+
_recordbody: _NEWLINE _INDENT [multiline_doc] attributes _DEDENT
redorddef: "record" NAME ":" _recordbody
MULTILINE_STRING: /"""([^"\\]*(\\.[^"\\]*)*)"""/
INLINE_STRING: /"([^"\\]*(\\.[^"\\]*)*)"/
_WS_INLINE: (" "|/\t/)+
COMMENT: /#[^\n]*/
_NEWLINE: ( /\r?\n[\t ]*/ | COMMENT )+
%import common.CNAME -> NAME
%import common.INT
%ignore /[\t \f]+/ // WS
%ignore /\\[\t \f]*\r?\n/ // LINE_CONT
%ignore COMMENT
%declare _INDENT _DEDENT
It works fine for multiline string docs for the record definition, works fine for inline attribute definition, but doesn't work for attribute multiline string doc.
The code I use to execute is this:
import sys
import pprint
from pathlib import Path
from lark import Lark, UnexpectedInput
from lark.indenter import Indenter
scheman_data_works = '''
record Order :
"""Order record documentation
should have arbitrary size"""
field1 Int
# field2 Datetime:
# """Attributes should also have
# multiline documentation"""
field3 String "inline documentation also works"
'''
scheman_data_wrong = '''
record Order :
"""Order record documentation
should have arbitrary size"""
field1 Int
field2 Datetime:
"""Attributes should also have
multiline documentation"""
field3 String "inline documentation also works"
'''
grammar = r'''
?start: (_NEWLINE | redorddef)*
simple_type: NAME
multiline_doc: MULTILINE_STRING _NEWLINE
inline_doc: INLINE_STRING
?element_doc: ":" _NEWLINE _INDENT multiline_doc _DEDENT | inline_doc
attribute_name: NAME
attribute_simple_type: attribute_name simple_type [element_doc] _NEWLINE
attributes: attribute_simple_type+
_recordbody: _NEWLINE _INDENT [multiline_doc] attributes _DEDENT
redorddef: "record" NAME ":" _recordbody
MULTILINE_STRING: /"""([^"\\]*(\\.[^"\\]*)*)"""/
INLINE_STRING: /"([^"\\]*(\\.[^"\\]*)*)"/
_WS_INLINE: (" "|/\t/)+
COMMENT: /#[^\n]*/
_NEWLINE: ( /\r?\n[\t ]*/ | COMMENT )+
%import common.CNAME -> NAME
%import common.INT
%ignore /[\t \f]+/ // WS
%ignore /\\[\t \f]*\r?\n/ // LINE_CONT
%ignore COMMENT
%declare _INDENT _DEDENT
'''
class SchemanIndenter(Indenter):
NL_type = '_NEWLINE'
OPEN_PAREN_types = ['LPAR', 'LSQB', 'LBRACE']
CLOSE_PAREN_types = ['RPAR', 'RSQB', 'RBRACE']
INDENT_type = '_INDENT'
DEDENT_type = '_DEDENT'
tab_len = 4
scheman_parser = Lark(grammar, parser='lalr', postlex=SchemanIndenter())
print(scheman_parser.parse(scheman_data_works).pretty())
print("\n\n")
print(scheman_parser.parse(scheman_data_wrong).pretty())
and the result is:
redorddef
Order
multiline_doc """Order record documentation
should have arbitrary size"""
attributes
attribute_simple_type
attribute_name field1
simple_type Int
attribute_simple_type
attribute_name field3
simple_type String
inline_doc "inline documentation also works"
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "schema_parser.py", line 83, in <module>
print(scheman_parser.parse(scheman_data_wrong).pretty())
File "/Users/branquif/Dropbox/swf_projects/schema-manager/.venv/lib/python3.7/site-packages/lark/lark.py", line 228, in parse
return self.parser.parse(text)
File "/Users/branquif/Dropbox/swf_projects/schema-manager/.venv/lib/python3.7/site-packages/lark/parser_frontends.py", line 38, in parse
return self.parser.parse(token_stream, *[sps] if sps is not NotImplemented else [])
File "/Users/branquif/Dropbox/swf_projects/schema-manager/.venv/lib/python3.7/site-packages/lark/parsers/lalr_parser.py", line 68, in parse
for token in stream:
File "/Users/branquif/Dropbox/swf_projects/schema-manager/.venv/lib/python3.7/site-packages/lark/indenter.py", line 31, in process
for token in stream:
File "/Users/branquif/Dropbox/swf_projects/schema-manager/.venv/lib/python3.7/site-packages/lark/lexer.py", line 319, in lex
for x in l.lex(stream, self.root_lexer.newline_types, self.root_lexer.ignore_types):
File "/Users/branquif/Dropbox/swf_projects/schema-manager/.venv/lib/python3.7/site-packages/lark/lexer.py", line 167, in lex
raise UnexpectedCharacters(stream, line_ctr.char_pos, line_ctr.line, line_ctr.column, state=self.state)
lark.exceptions.UnexpectedCharacters: No terminal defined for 'f' at line 11 col 2
field3 String "inline documentation also
^
I undestand indented grammars are more complex, and lark seems to make it easier, but cannot find the mistake here.
PS: I also tried pyparsing, without success wit this same scenario, and would be hard for me to move to PLY, given the amount of code that will probably be needed.
The bug comes from misplaced _NEWLINE terminals. Generally, it's recommended to make sure rules are balanced, in terms of their role in the grammar. So here's how you should have defined element_doc
:
?element_doc: ":" _NEWLINE _INDENT multiline_doc _DEDENT
| inline_doc _NEWLINE
Notice the added newline, which means that no matter which of the two options the parser takes, it ends in a similar state, syntax-wise (_DEDENT
also matches a newline).
The second change, as a consequence of the first one, is:
attribute_simple_type: attribute_name simple_type (element_doc|_NEWLINE)
As element_doc
already handles newlines, we shouldn't try to match it twice.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With