A point from ISO draft n3290 section 5.1.2 paragraph, point 19:
The closure type associated with a lambda-expression has a deleted (8.4.3) default constructor and a deleted copy assignment operator. It has an implicitly-declared copy constructor (12.8) and may have an implicitly declared move constructor (12.8). [ Note: The copy/move constructor is implicitly defined in the same way as any other implicitly declared copy/move constructor would be implicitly defined. —end note ]
Can any one please ....tell some example for this point to understand?
Is there any chance/way to check the Closure object(type)?
They're being added in as part of Project Lambda. But what is a Lambda expression? The term “Lambda” comes from mathematics, where it's called lambda calculus. In programming, a Lambda expression (or function) is just an anonymous function, i.e., a function with no name.
For Lambda expressions, the compiler doesn't translate them into something which is already understood by JVM. Lambda syntax that is written by the developer is desugared into JVM level instructions generated during compilation, which means the actual responsibility of constructing lambda is deferred to runtime.
The closure type associated with a lambda-expression has a deleted (8.4.3) default constructor
int main() {
auto closure = [](){};
typedef decltype(closure) ClosureType;
ClosureType closure2; // <-- not allowed
return 0;
}
and a deleted copy assignment operator. It has an implicitly-declared copy constructor (12.8) and may have an implicitly declared move constructor (12.8).
#include <utility>
int main() {
auto closure = [](){};
typedef decltype(closure) ClosureType;
ClosureType closure2 = closure; // <-- copy constructor
ClosureType closure3 = std::move(closure); // <-- move constructor
closure2 = closure3; // <-- copy assignment (not allowed)
return 0;
}
struct LambdaExample{
// deleted operations = not allowed
LambdaExample() = delete;
LambdaExample& operator=(LambdaExample const&) = delete;
// generated by the compiler:
LambdaExample(LambdaExample const& other);
LambdaExample(LambdaExample&& other);
// anything else a lambda needs
};
For your second question, if you mean that you can look into the implementation, then nope, not possible. It's created on-the-fly by the compiler. If you mean to get the type of the lambda, sure:
auto l = [](){};
typedef decltype(l) closure_type;
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With