I my 1.9 cluster created this deployment role for the dev user. Deployment works as expected. Now I want to give exec and logs access to developer. What role I need to add for exec to the pod?
kind: Role
name: deployment-manager
rules:
- apiGroups: ["", "extensions", "apps"]
resources: ["deployments", "replicasets", "pods"]
verbs: ["get", "list", "watch", "create", "update", "patch", "delete"]
Error message:
kubectl exec nginx -it -- sh
Error from server (Forbidden): pods "nginx" is forbidden: User "dev" cannot create pods/exec in the namespace "dev"
Thanks SR
To limit the ability to kubectl exec to pods what you want to do is create a custom Role & RoleBinding that removes the create verb for the pods/exec resource. An easy approach to this might be to copy the default RBAC policies, and then make the appropriate edit and rename.
The RBAC docs say that
Most resources are represented by a string representation of their name, such as “pods”, just as it appears in the URL for the relevant API endpoint. However, some Kubernetes APIs involve a “subresource”, such as the logs for a pod. [...] To represent this in an RBAC role, use a slash to delimit the resource and subresource.
To allow a subject to read both pods and pod logs, and be able to exec into the pod, you would write:
kind: Role
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
metadata:
namespace: default
name: pod-and-pod-logs-reader
rules:
- apiGroups: [""]
resources: ["pods", "pods/log"]
verbs: ["get", "list"]
- apiGroups: [""]
resources: ["pods/exec"]
verbs: ["create"]
Some client libraries may do an http GET to negotiate a websocket first, which would require the "get" verb. kubectl sends an http POST instead, that's why it requires the "create" verb in that case.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With