I am not understand why this code not working
class nullableGenericA<T: Any?>{
fun someMethod(v: T){}
fun someMethod(){
someMethod(null)
}
}
error: "Null can not be a value of a non-null type T". How it works? If nullable is not part of type why works this
class NullableGenericB<T>(val list: ArrayList<T>){
fun add(obj: T){
list.add(obj)
}
}
fun testNullableGenericB(){
NullableGenericB<String?>(ArrayList()).add(null)
}
Your generic type is not necessarily nullable. It only has an upper bound of allowing nullable, but it is not constrained to be nullable. Since T could possibly be non-nullable, it is not safe to pass null as T. For example, someone could create an instance of your class with non-nullable type:
val nonNullableA = NullableGenericA<String>()
If you want to design it so you can always use nullables for the generic type, then you should use T? at the use sites where it is acceptable. Then, even if T is non-nullable, a nullable version of T is used at the function site.
class NullableGenericA<T>{
fun someMethod(v: T?) {}
fun someMethod() {
someMethod(null)
}
fun somethingThatReturnsNullableT(): T? {
return null
}
}
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With