Does Ruby have a plain-English keyword for exclusive or, like they have "and" and "or"? If not, is this because exclusive or doesn't allow evaluation short-cutting?
No it doesn't, you can only use ^
.
Don't know why there isn't particularly, may just be because it isn't as commonly used.
I ran into an issue because the '^' operator acts bitwise on numbers,
true ^ 1
=> false
1 ^ true
TypeError: can't convert true into Integer
true ^ 1
so my workaround was:
( !!a ^ !!b )
where the double-bang coerces them into booleans.
!!1 ^ !!true
=> false
!!1 ^ !!false
=> true
Firstly, I don't think shortcircuiting can sensibly apply to XOR: whatever the value of the first operand, the second needs to be examined.
Secondly, and, &&, or and || use shortcircuiting in all cases; the only difference between the "word" and "symbol" versions is precedence. I believe that and
and or
are present to provide the same function as perl has in lines like
process_without_error or die
I think the reason for not having a xor
named function is probably that there's no point in a low-precedence operator in this case and that it's already a confusing enough situation!
Try ^
true ^ false #=> true
true ^ true #=> false
false ^ false #=> false
No plain english equivalent operator though.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With