The documentation says you can use $.noConflict() like this:
jQuery.noConflict();
(function($) {
$(function() {
// more code using $ as alias to jQuery
});
})(jQuery);
// other code using $ as an alias to the other library
It also states that calling it returns an instance of the jQuery object, so I could do this:
jQuery.noConflict()(function(){
// code using jQuery
});
// other code using $ as an alias to the other library
However, is this combination valid?
(function($) {
$(function() {
// more code using $ as alias to jQuery
});
})(jQuery.noConflict());
// other code using $ as an alias to the other library
If so, is there a reason to not do it this way? And also (if it works), why not always use this method to guarantee that inside of our closure, $ == jQuery?
The last method works as well - jQuery.noConflict()
returns the jQuery object, which is passed as the $
argument to the function.
I don't see a reason to not do it that way and would prefer it to the other methods.
I don't see why not since jQuery.noConflict
returns the jQuery
object and it's evaluated before the function is called.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With