Why in the following code .height() returns 95 rather than 100, while .width() returns 200 as expected ? I work with Firefox 3.6.3.
HTML:
<table><tr>
<td id="my"></td>
</tr></table>
<div id="log"></div>
CSS:
#my {
border: 5px solid red;
}
JS:
$("#my").width(200).height(100);
$("#log").append("Width = " + $("#my").width() + "<br />");
$("#log").append("Height = " + $("#my").height());
I tried .outerWidth() and .outerHeight() and also .innerWidth() and .innerHeight(), but none of them returns the expected result: code example
But, if I set position: absolute
it looks much better !
Can anyone explain this behavior ?
There are a few jQuery methods for calculating height and width. Try using outerHeight()
Excerpt from jQuery Docs: http://api.jquery.com/outerHeight/
.outerHeight( [ includeMargin ] )
includeMargin - A Boolean indicating whether to include the element's margin in the calculation.
http://api.jquery.com/innerHeight/
.innerHeight()
This method returns the height of the element, including top and bottom padding, in pixels.
Edit: Setting height() on the td-element is adjusted to include the default padding (1px). The computed dimensions of are actually...
(source: wordofjohn.com)
You should set the default padding to 0px to avoid these issues.
table td {
padding: 0;
}
Edit 2: It appears to be a browser issue (probably something related to the rendering engine's method of calculating a table's dimensions). The effects of this behavior will vary across browers. You should find an alternate, table-less, solution using divs.
I can't really explain this behaviour better than John, but since this browser inconsistency is still around (at least for those who can't upgrade jQuery version) I thought I would share a workaround for this problem.
Using the HTML DOM properties clientHeight and clientWidth seems to be consistent over most browsers.
$("#my").width(200).height(100);
$("#log").append("Width = " + $("#my").attr("clientWidth") + "<br />");
$("#log").append("Height = " + $("#my").attr("clientHeight"));
It's also likely that you may want to use offsetHeight/offsetWidth instead, depending on what you need.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With