Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

JPA: How to have one-to-many relation of the same Entity type

There's an Entity Class "A". Class A might have children of the same type "A". Also "A" should hold it's parent if it is a child.

Is this possible? If so how should I map the relations in the Entity class? ["A" has an id column.]

like image 365
sanjayav Avatar asked Aug 03 '10 04:08

sanjayav


People also ask

Can a JPA entity have multiple OneToMany associations?

You can have multiple one-to-many associations, as long as only one is EAGER.

How does JPA represent many-to-many entity relationships?

In JPA we use the @ManyToMany annotation to model many-to-many relationships. This type of relationship can be unidirectional or bidirectional: In a unidirectional relationship only one entity in the relationship points the other. In a bidirectional relationship both entities point to each other.

What is mappedBy one-to-many?

The mappedBy attribute characterizes a bidirectional association and must be set on the parent-side. In other words, for a bidirectional @OneToMany association, set mappedBy to @OneToMany on the parent-side and add @ManyToOne on the child-side referenced by mappedBy .


2 Answers

Yes, this is possible. This is a special case of the standard bidirectional @ManyToOne/@OneToMany relationship. It is special because the entity on each end of the relationship is the same. The general case is detailed in Section 2.10.2 of the JPA 2.0 spec.

Here's a worked example. First, the entity class A:

@Entity public class A implements Serializable {      @Id     @GeneratedValue(strategy=GenerationType.AUTO)     private Long id;     @ManyToOne     private A parent;     @OneToMany(mappedBy="parent")     private Collection<A> children;      // Getters, Setters, serialVersionUID, etc... } 

Here's a rough main() method that persists three such entities:

public static void main(String[] args) {      EntityManager em = ... // from EntityManagerFactory, injection, etc.      em.getTransaction().begin();      A parent   = new A();     A son      = new A();     A daughter = new A();      son.setParent(parent);     daughter.setParent(parent);     parent.setChildren(Arrays.asList(son, daughter));      em.persist(parent);     em.persist(son);     em.persist(daughter);      em.getTransaction().commit(); } 

In this case, all three entity instances must be persisted before transaction commit. If I fail to persist one of the entities in the graph of parent-child relationships, then an exception is thrown on commit(). On Eclipselink, this is a RollbackException detailing the inconsistency.

This behavior is configurable through the cascade attribute on A's @OneToMany and @ManyToOne annotations. For instance, if I set cascade=CascadeType.ALL on both of those annotations, I could safely persist one of the entities and ignore the others. Say I persisted parent in my transaction. The JPA implementation traverses parent's children property because it is marked with CascadeType.ALL. The JPA implementation finds son and daughter there. It then persists both children on my behalf, even though I didn't explicitly request it.

One more note. It is always the programmer's responsibility to update both sides of a bidirectional relationship. In other words, whenever I add a child to some parent, I must update the child's parent property accordingly. Updating only one side of a bidirectional relationship is an error under JPA. Always update both sides of the relationship. This is written unambiguously on page 42 of the JPA 2.0 spec:

Note that it is the application that bears responsibility for maintaining the consistency of runtime relationships—for example, for insuring that the “one” and the “many” sides of a bidirectional relationship are consistent with one another when the application updates the relationship at runtime.

like image 195
Dan LaRocque Avatar answered Sep 17 '22 13:09

Dan LaRocque


For me the trick was to use many-to-many relationship. Suppose that your entity A is a division that can have sub-divisions. Then (skipping irrelevant details):

@Entity @Table(name = "DIVISION") @EntityListeners( { HierarchyListener.class }) public class Division implements IHierarchyElement {    private Long id;    @Id   @Column(name = "DIV_ID")   public Long getId() {         return id;   }   ...   private Division parent;   private List<Division> subDivisions = new ArrayList<Division>();   ...   @ManyToOne   @JoinColumn(name = "DIV_PARENT_ID")   public Division getParent() {         return parent;   }    @ManyToMany   @JoinTable(name = "DIVISION", joinColumns = { @JoinColumn(name = "DIV_PARENT_ID") }, inverseJoinColumns = { @JoinColumn(name = "DIV_ID") })   public List<Division> getSubDivisions() {         return subDivisions;   } ... } 

Since I had some extensive business logic around hierarchical structure and JPA (based on relational model) is very weak to support it I introduced interface IHierarchyElement and entity listener HierarchyListener:

public interface IHierarchyElement {      public String getNodeId();      public IHierarchyElement getParent();      public Short getLevel();      public void setLevel(Short level);      public IHierarchyElement getTop();      public void setTop(IHierarchyElement top);      public String getTreePath();      public void setTreePath(String theTreePath); }   public class HierarchyListener {      @PrePersist     @PreUpdate     public void setHierarchyAttributes(IHierarchyElement entity) {         final IHierarchyElement parent = entity.getParent();          // set level         if (parent == null) {             entity.setLevel((short) 0);         } else {             if (parent.getLevel() == null) {                 throw new PersistenceException("Parent entity must have level defined");             }             if (parent.getLevel() == Short.MAX_VALUE) {                 throw new PersistenceException("Maximum number of hierarchy levels reached - please restrict use of parent/level relationship for "                         + entity.getClass());             }             entity.setLevel(Short.valueOf((short) (parent.getLevel().intValue() + 1)));         }          // set top         if (parent == null) {             entity.setTop(entity);         } else {             if (parent.getTop() == null) {                 throw new PersistenceException("Parent entity must have top defined");             }             entity.setTop(parent.getTop());         }          // set tree path         try {             if (parent != null) {                 String parentTreePath = StringUtils.isNotBlank(parent.getTreePath()) ? parent.getTreePath() : "";                 entity.setTreePath(parentTreePath + parent.getNodeId() + ".");             } else {                 entity.setTreePath(null);             }         } catch (UnsupportedOperationException uoe) {             LOGGER.warn(uoe);         }     }  } 
like image 22
topchef Avatar answered Sep 16 '22 13:09

topchef