Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Join/Where with LINQ and Lambda

Tags:

c#

join

lambda

linq

I'm having trouble with a query written in LINQ and Lambda. So far, I'm getting a lot of errors here's my code:

int id = 1; var query = database.Posts.Join(database.Post_Metas,                                 post => database.Posts.Where(x => x.ID == id),                                 meta => database.Post_Metas.Where(x => x.Post_ID == id),                                 (post, meta) => new { Post = post, Meta = meta }); 

I'm new to using LINQ, so I'm not sure if this query is correct.

like image 923
David Avatar asked May 04 '10 17:05

David


People also ask

Can we use join in LINQ?

LINQ Join queries. As we know the JOIN clause is very useful when merging more than two table or object data into a single unit. It combines different source elements into one and also creates the relationship between them. Using the join, you can grab the data based on your conditions.

How use inner join in LINQ?

A simple inner join that correlates elements from two data sources based on a simple key. An inner join that correlates elements from two data sources based on a composite key. A composite key, which is a key that consists of more than one value, enables you to correlate elements based on more than one property.


2 Answers

I find that if you're familiar with SQL syntax, using the LINQ query syntax is much clearer, more natural, and makes it easier to spot errors:

var id = 1; var query =    from post in database.Posts    join meta in database.Post_Metas on post.ID equals meta.Post_ID    where post.ID == id    select new { Post = post, Meta = meta }; 

If you're really stuck on using lambdas though, your syntax is quite a bit off. Here's the same query, using the LINQ extension methods:

var id = 1; var query = database.Posts    // your starting point - table in the "from" statement    .Join(database.Post_Metas, // the source table of the inner join       post => post.ID,        // Select the primary key (the first part of the "on" clause in an sql "join" statement)       meta => meta.Post_ID,   // Select the foreign key (the second part of the "on" clause)       (post, meta) => new { Post = post, Meta = meta }) // selection    .Where(postAndMeta => postAndMeta.Post.ID == id);    // where statement 
like image 167
Daniel Schaffer Avatar answered Oct 02 '22 13:10

Daniel Schaffer


You could go two ways with this. Using LINQPad (invaluable if you're new to LINQ) and a dummy database, I built the following queries:

Posts.Join(     Post_metas,     post => post.Post_id,     meta => meta.Post_id,     (post, meta) => new { Post = post, Meta = meta } ) 

or

from p in Posts join pm in Post_metas on p.Post_id equals pm.Post_id select new { Post = p, Meta = pm } 

In this particular case, I think the LINQ syntax is cleaner (I change between the two depending upon which is easiest to read).

The thing I'd like to point out though is that if you have appropriate foreign keys in your database, (between post and post_meta) then you probably don't need an explicit join unless you're trying to load a large number of records. Your example seems to indicate that you are trying to load a single post and its metadata. Assuming that there are many post_meta records for each post, then you could do the following:

var post = Posts.Single(p => p.ID == 1); var metas = post.Post_metas.ToList(); 

If you want to avoid the n+1 problem, then you can explicitly tell LINQ to SQL to load all of the related items in one go (although this may be an advanced topic for when you're more familiar with L2S). The example below says "when you load a Post, also load all of its records associated with it via the foreign key represented by the 'Post_metas' property":

var dataLoadOptions = new DataLoadOptions(); dataLoadOptions.LoadWith<Post>(p => p.Post_metas);  var dataContext = new MyDataContext(); dataContext.LoadOptions = dataLoadOptions;  var post = Posts.Single(p => p.ID == 1); // Post_metas loaded automagically 

It is possible to make many LoadWith calls on a single set of DataLoadOptions for the same type, or many different types. If you do this lots though, you might just want to consider caching.

like image 42
Damian Powell Avatar answered Oct 02 '22 11:10

Damian Powell