As you know, java.util.Objects
is
This class consists of static utility methods for operating on objects.
One of such methods is Objects.isNull()
.
My understanding is that Objects.isNull()
would remove the chance of accidentally assigning a null value to object by omitting the second =
.
However, the API Note states:
This method exists to be used as a Predicate, filter(Objects::isNull)
Would there be any reason/circumstance for which I should use object == null
over Objects.isNull()
in an if statement?
Should Objects.isNull()
be confined to Predicates exclusively?
Overview. The method isNull is a static method of the Objects class in java that checks whether the input object reference supplied to it is null or not. If the passed object is null , then the method returns true . If the passed object is non-null , then the method returns false .
To check if it is null, we call the isNull() method and pass the object getUserObject as a parameter. It returns true as the passed object is null.
In order to check whether a Java object is Null or not, we can either use the isNull() method of the Objects class or comparison operator.
The nonNull method is a static method of the Objects class in Java that checks whether the input object reference supplied to it is non-null or not. If the passed object is non-null, then the method returns true. If the passed object is null , then the method returns false.
should use object == null over Objects.isNull() in a if statement?
If you look at the source code of IsNull
method,
/* Returns true if the provided reference is null otherwise returns false.*/ public static boolean isNull(Object obj) { return obj == null; }
It is the same. There is no difference. So you can use it safely.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With