I'm guessing that using PHP's header("location: here.html") would be much better javascript's window.location("here.html") as far as search engine visibility goes. I would assume that the server redirect would show google the correct content and the javascript redirect would be read as a page with the javascript redirect code in it.
Reason being is I have a client that wants me to take their current website and import it into a CMS system (I'm using e107) and I don't want their old pages to lose their current page rank. I was thinking of putting redirects on the old pages to the new pages in the CMS system.
The only way to forward on search engine rank is with an HTTP 301 (permanent) redirect.
Using PHP's header('Location')
will give a 302 unless you specify the code like this:
header('Location: http://....', true, 301);
It might be easier to use .htaccess, like this:
RewriteRule ^old.php /new.php [R=301]
Yes, you want to do server side redirection (PHP) if you can.
<?
Header( "HTTP/1.1 301 Moved Permanently" );
Header( "Location: http://www.new-url.com" );
?>
via
You can also do this using
header("location: http://www.new-url.com")
but it won't be as good SEO wise
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With