So I've been reading through Javascript - The Good Parts and one thing that Crockford points out is the use weakness of global variables in Javascript, in such a way that if your product is expanded in some manner, and it relies on a 'global' variable it could be inadvertently set.
That's all good and fine and I understand the pros/cons of protecting variables, in other manners such as closures as well. However, I was doing some thinking, and wrapping code in a function like so:
(function () {
var x = 'meh';
})();
(function () {
alert(typeof x); // undefined
})();
gives it variable scope, which thereby prevents cross contamination of variables. I'm not sure if there's a blatant downside to this approach though and wondered if the community had any input, or if I'm just overthinking things and ignoring the main point.
That's a perfectly legal way of doing things -- the variables inside of your function (as long as they are prefaced by var
) are local to the function. It's called the module pattern, and it's very well accepted.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With