I guess most of you have seen the following code snippet:
Function.prototype.method = function (name, func) {
this.prototype[name] = func;
return this;
};
I also know that it will affect all functions since they are all objects created by Function so that they can access method named "method", however I am confused why Function itself also can also access "method" like following:
Function.method('test', function () {return 1;});
Edorka's answer is correct: Function is its own constructor (i.e. "parent").
Function.constructor; // function Function() { [native code] }
Normally you can't do what you're doing. For example, this won't work:
f = function () {};
f.prototype.a = 5;
f.a; // undefined
This kind of thing only works if you use a function as a constructor, like so:
f = function () {};
f.prototype.a = 5;
g = new f();
g.a; // 5
But Function is weird, it is the constructor for all functions and is also a function itself, so it templates its properties off its own prototype. Hence you can call Function.method()
in your code.
Because Function
is itself a function:
typeof Function === 'function'
Object.getPrototypeOf(Function) === Function.prototype
And you can see it being called as a function (a form of indirect eval
):
Function('return 1+2')() === 3
All that as defined in the spec.
zerkms asked in a comment above:
Which came first - the Function object or the Function prototype?
We have to understand that what's exposed to us, the puny programmers, is different than what's represented internally. This can be exemplified by overriding the Array
constructor (tip: don't try this while writing an answer, you'll get a lot of errors):
new Array(0, 1, 2); //gives you [0, 1, 2]
Array = function () { return [4] };
new Array(0, 1, 2); //gives you [4]
//however,
[0, 1, 2] //will always give you [0, 1, 2]
This is because of a section in the spec (a bit down, in the "semantics" section):
Let array be the result of creating a new object as if by the expression
new Array()
whereArray
is the standard built-in constructor with that name.
Using the array literal (or array initializer as the spec calls it) you ensure that you use the built-in Array constructor.
Why did I give this example? First of all, because it's a fun example. Second, to demonstrate how what we do and what's actually done are different. To answer zerkms, the Function object most likely came first, but that was not the first function. We don't have access to that built-in function.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With