I am new to Event Handlers and I have come across a code that is written below
document.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded", function() {
initialiseMediaPlayer();
}, false);
Is there any difference in writing the same code as
document.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded", initialiseMediaPlayer();, false);
Ultimately we are calling the same function, so does it make a difference or is there some advantage in writing it in the manner above?
document.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded", function() {
initialiseMediaPlayer();
}, false);
Will execute initialiseMediaPlayer
when the dom content is loaded.
document.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded", initialiseMediaPlayer();, false);
is a syntax error; if you remove the semicolon:
document.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded", initialiseMediaPlayer(), false);
calls initialiseMediaPlayer
immediately, then passes the return value (which likely isn't a function) to addEventListener
. This won't act as desired.
You can do
document.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded", initialiseMediaPlayer, false);
(remove the parentheses = function call). Then initialiseMediaPlayer
will be executed on dom content loaded, and act as desired.
However, unlike in the former case, initialiseMediaPlayer
will actually receive the arguments given by the browser. Also, its return value is received by the browser. In case of DOMContentLoaded
, most likely this doesn't matter much.
You also avoid creating one extra anonymous function if you pass initialiseMediaPlayer
directly. Again, the effect is not really perceptible from the user's standpoint.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With