Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Java - Private member vs default member of a private inner class

Since an enclosing class can access the private fields of its inner class, when should be they declared private, default or public for a private inner class?

like image 227
Ravi Avatar asked Aug 31 '25 01:08

Ravi


1 Answers

At first glance, it seems irrelevant to specify an access modifier on the members of inner classes. As you pointed out, the containing class can access all members anyway.

Here are a few additional considerations though:

  • Sometimes inner classes are declared public and serve as part of the interface definition of the containing class. Perhaps the outer class has a method that returns an instance of the inner class. In this case, the inner class is subject to the same best practices for member visibility as top-level classes. It's preferrable to keep implementation details private in this case.
  • Although it wouldn't be enforced by the compiler, marking an inner class's members as private can document for future maintainers that those members are not intended to be accessed directly by the outer class code. Of course, at that point, it might warrant refactoring the inner class to its own top-level class.
  • Sometimes inner classes are used in combination with reflection-based frameworks that only operate on public members. For example, the Jackson JSON serializer by default only operates on public members. It is possible to make it operate on private members by doing a few things like adding a public getter. This is extra work, so it may be more convenient to declare the member public in the first place.
  • If the above points do not apply, and in the absence of any other requirements, the simplest and shortest code is to omit the access modifier entirely (default/package-private). This would be a coding style question for a project to consider.
like image 153
Chris Nauroth Avatar answered Sep 02 '25 14:09

Chris Nauroth