I am reading this book called "Java Concurrency in Practice" and the author gives an example of an unsafe object publication. Here is the example.
public Holder holder;
public void initialize(){
holder = new Holder(42);
}
and
public class Holder {
private int n;
public Holder(int n) { this.n = n; }
public void assertSanity() {
if (n != n)
throw new AssertionError("This statement is false.");
}
}
So does this mean that other thread has access to an object when it is not even fully constructed? I guess that when a thread A calls holder.initialize();
and thread B calls holder.assertSanity();
the condition n != n
will not be met if thread A has not yet executed this.n = n;
Does this also mean that if I have a simpler code like
int n;
System.out.println(n == n); //false?
A problem can occur if the assertSanity method is pre-empted between the first and second load of n
(the first load would see 0
and the second load would see the value set by the constructor). The problem is that the basic operations are:
holder
to the new instanceThe compiler/JVM/CPU is allowed to reorder steps #2 and #3 since there are no memory barriers (final, volatile, synchronized, etc.)
From your second example, it's not clear if "n" is a local variable or a member variable or how another thread might be simultaneously mutating it.
Your understanding is correct. That is exactly the problem the author seek to illustrate. There are no guards in Java that ensure an object is fully constructed prior to accessing in when multiple threads are concerned. Holder is not thread-safe as it contains mutable state. The use of synchronization
is required to fix this.
I'm not sure I understand your 2nd example, it lacks context.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With