I am trying to do this:
public class BaseTable<T extends TableEntry>
{
    protected int mRows;
    protected int mCols;
    protected ArrayList<T> mEntries;
    public BaseTable(int rows, int cols)
    {
        mRows = rows;
        mCols = cols;
        mEntries = new ArrayList<T>();
        for (int i = 0; i < rows; i++)
        {
            mEntries.add(new T(cols)); //this obv. doesn't work
        }
    }
}
Instantiating generics is hard enough as it is, but what makes this even harder is that T here does not have a default constructor, it takes a single int parameter in its constructor.
How can this be done?
I have asked a follow up question here too. I'd be grateful if you could answer that as well.
This question is related, but only is relevant where the classes are assumed to have a default constructor.
It was already said, that you can't create an instance of T with new, so
I would use the Factory Pattern or a Prototype Pattern
So your constructor would look like
public BaseTable(int rows, int cols, LineFactory factory) with an appropriate instance of a factory.
In your case, I would prefer the Prototype Pattern, because your TableEntry objects are probably very light-weight. Your code would look like:
public BaseTable(int rows, int cols, T prototype)
{       
  mRows = rows;
  mCols = cols;
  prototype.setColumns(cols);
  mEntries = new ArrayList<T>();
  for (int i = 0; i < rows; i++)
  {
    @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
    T newClone = (T)prototype.clone();
    mEntries.add(newClone); //this obv. does work :)
  }
}
public static void main(String[] args)
{
  new BaseTable<SimpleTableEntry>(10, 2, new SimpleTableEntry());
}
                        If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With