I have a Java thread:
class MyThread extends Thread {
@Override
public void run() {
BufferedReader stdin =
new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(System.in));
String msg;
try {
while ((msg = stdin.readLine()) != null) {
System.out.println("Got: " + msg);
}
System.out.println("Aborted.");
} catch (IOException ex) {
ex.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
}
In another thread, how do I abort the stdin.readline()
call in this thread, so that this thread prints Aborted.
? I have tried System.in.close()
, but that doesn't make any difference, stdin.readline()
is still blocking.
I'm interested in solutions without
System.in
).Whenever we want to stop a thread from running state by calling stop() method of Thread class in Java. This method stops the execution of a running thread and removes it from the waiting threads pool and garbage collected. A thread will also move to the dead state automatically when it reaches the end of its method.
interrupt() method: If any thread is in sleeping or waiting for a state then using the interrupt() method, we can interrupt the execution of that thread by showing InterruptedException. A thread that is in the sleeping or waiting state can be interrupted with the help of the interrupt() method of Thread class.
A thread can send an interrupt by invoking interrupt on the Thread object for the thread to be interrupted. This means interruption of a thread is caused by any other thread calling the interrupt() method. void interrupt() - Interrupts the thread.
The stop() method is deprecated. It forces the thread to stop executing.
Heinz Kabutz's newsletter shows how to abort System.in
reads:
import java.io.*;
import java.util.concurrent.*;
class ConsoleInputReadTask implements Callable<String> {
public String call() throws IOException {
BufferedReader br = new BufferedReader(
new InputStreamReader(System.in));
System.out.println("ConsoleInputReadTask run() called.");
String input;
do {
System.out.println("Please type something: ");
try {
// wait until we have data to complete a readLine()
while (!br.ready()) {
Thread.sleep(200);
}
input = br.readLine();
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
System.out.println("ConsoleInputReadTask() cancelled");
return null;
}
} while ("".equals(input));
System.out.println("Thank You for providing input!");
return input;
}
}
public class ConsoleInput {
private final int tries;
private final int timeout;
private final TimeUnit unit;
public ConsoleInput(int tries, int timeout, TimeUnit unit) {
this.tries = tries;
this.timeout = timeout;
this.unit = unit;
}
public String readLine() throws InterruptedException {
ExecutorService ex = Executors.newSingleThreadExecutor();
String input = null;
try {
// start working
for (int i = 0; i < tries; i++) {
System.out.println(String.valueOf(i + 1) + ". loop");
Future<String> result = ex.submit(
new ConsoleInputReadTask());
try {
input = result.get(timeout, unit);
break;
} catch (ExecutionException e) {
e.getCause().printStackTrace();
} catch (TimeoutException e) {
System.out.println("Cancelling reading task");
result.cancel(true);
System.out.println("\nThread cancelled. input is null");
}
}
} finally {
ex.shutdownNow();
}
return input;
}
}
Now, I don't know whether this approach leaks, isn't portable or has any non-obvious side-effects. Personally, I would be reluctant to use it.
You might be able to do something with NIO channels and file descriptors - my own experiments with them didn't yield any results.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With