The following gives me an error message:
public static List<Comparable<?>> merge(Set<List<Comparable<?>>> lists) {
List<Comparable<?>> result = new LinkedList<Comparable<?>>();
HashBiMap<List<Comparable<?>>, Integer> location = HashBiMap.create();
int totalSize;
for (List<Comparable<?>> l : lists) {
location.put(l, 0);
totalSize += l.size();
}
boolean first;
List<Comparable<?>> lowest; //the list with the lowest item to add
int index;
while (result.size() < totalSize) {
first = true;
for (List<Comparable<?>> l : lists) {
if (! l.isEmpty()) {
if (first) {
lowest = l;
}
else if (l.get(location.get(l)).compareTo(lowest.get(location.get(lowest))) <= 0) { //error here
lowest = l;
}
}
}
index = location.get(lowest);
result.add(lowest.get(index));
lowest.remove(index);
}
return result;
}
The error is:
The method compareTo(capture#1-of ?) in the type Comparable<capture#1-of ?> is not applicable for the arguments (Comparable<capture#2-of ?>)
What's going on here? I made the type of everything Comparable
so I could call .compareTo
and sort this list. Am I using generics incorrectly?
List<?>
means "List of anything", so two objects with this type are not the same: One could be a list of String
, the other a list of BigDecimal
. Obviously, those are not the same.
List<T>
means "List of anything but when you see T
again, it's the same T
".
You must tell the compiler when you mean the same type in different places. Try:
public static <T extends Comparable<? super T>> List<T> merge(Set<List<T>> lists) {
List<T> result = new LinkedList<T>();
HashBiMap<List<T>, Integer> location = HashBiMap.create();
[EDIT] So what does <T extends Comparable<? super T>> List<T>
mean? The first part defines a type T
with the following properties: It must implement the interface Comparable<? super T>
(or Comparable<X>
where X
is also defined in terms of T
).
? super T
means that the type which the Comparable
supports must T
or one of its super types.
Imagine for a moment this inheritance: Double extends Integer extends Number
. This is not correct in Java but imagine that Double
is just an Integer
plus a fraction part. In this scenario, a Comparable
which works for Number
also works for Integer
and Double
since both derive from Number
. So Comparable<Number>
would satisfy the super
part for T
being Number
, Integer
or Double
.
As long as each of these types support the Comparable
interface, they also satisfy the first part of the declaration. This means, you can pass in Number
for T
and the resulting code will also work when there are Integer
and Double
instances in the lists. If you Integer
for T
, you can still use Double
but Number
is not possible because it doesn't satisfy T extends Comparable
anymore (the super
part would still work, though).
The next step is to understand that the expression between static
and List
just declares the properties of the type T
which is used later in the code. This way, you don't have to repeat this long declaration over and over again. It's part of the behavior of the method (like public
) and not part of the actual code.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With