I have submitted a task using executors and I need it to stop after some time (e.g. 5 minutes). I have tried doing like this:
for (Future<?> fut : e.invokeAll(tasks, 300, TimeUnit.SECONDS)) {
try {
fut.get();
} catch (CancellationException ex) {
fut.cancel(true);
tasks.clear();
} catch(ExecutionException ex){
ex.printStackTrace(); //FIXME: gestita con printstack
}
}
But I always get an error: I have a shared Vector that needs to be modified by the tasks and then read by a thread, and even if I stop all the task, if the timeout occurs I get:
Exception in thread "Thread-1" java.util.ConcurrentModificationException
Is there something wrong? How can I stop the tasks submitted that are still working after 5 minutes?
And call() method can throw an exception while run() method cannot. You can cancel the task submitted to ExecutorService by simply calling the cancel method on the future submitted when the task is submitted.
The ExecutorService class has 2 methods just for this: shutdown() and shutdownNow(). After using the shutdown() method, you can call awaitTermination() to block until all of the started tasks have completed.
When using an Executor, we can shut it down by calling the shutdown() or shutdownNow() methods. Although, it won't wait until all threads stop executing.
Just because you call cancel()
on Future
doesn't mean that the task will stop automatically. You have to do some work within the task to make sure that it will stop:
cancel(true)
so that an interrupt is sent to the task.InterruptedException
. If a function in your task throws an InterruptedException
, make sure you exit gracefully as soon as possible upon catching the exception.Thread.currentThread().isInterrupted()
if the task does continuous computation.For example:
class LongTask implements Callable<Double> {
public Double call() {
// Sleep for a while; handle InterruptedException appropriately
try {
Thread.sleep(10000);
} catch (InterruptedException ex) {
System.out.println("Exiting gracefully!");
return null;
}
// Compute for a while; check Thread.isInterrupted() periodically
double sum = 0.0;
for (long i = 0; i < 10000000; i++) {
sum += 10.0
if (Thread.currentThread().isInterrupted()) {
System.out.println("Exiting gracefully");
return null;
}
}
return sum;
}
}
Also, as other posts have mentioned: ConcurrentModificationException
can be thrown even if using the thread-safe Vector
class, because iterators you obtain from Vector
are not thread-safe, and thus need to be synchronized. The enhanced for-loop uses iterators, so watch out:
final Vector<Double> vector = new Vector<Double>();
vector.add(1.0);
vector.add(2.0);
// Not thread safe! If another thread modifies "vector" during the loop, then
// a ConcurrentModificationException will be thrown.
for (Double num : vector) {
System.out.println(num);
}
// You can try this as a quick fix, but it might not be what you want:
synchronized (vector) { // "vector" must be final
for (Double num : vector) {
System.out.println(num);
}
}
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With